Yes, and that didn’t revive democracy. Or prevent king macron

What are you even talking about?

Macron has been doing whatever he wanted for the past years. He’s changed completely the political norm of France, brought the vision if the left from a normal party, to the evil antisemitic violent terrorist party, while normalising the far right so much that now most right-wing parties all blend together and say the same fascist crap.

France has, since Macron, been “dropping out of democracy”, according to the international federation for human rights. That’s not just a little stalemate here.

The fucking government gave a *minute of silence for a nazi terrorist that died after attacking people, while being watched by cops who saw them initiate the attack and intentionally did nothing. What more do you want? You’re waiting for them to do like in the US and have the government do nazi salutes?

De Gaulle ran away from the war to hide, took advantage of the french resistance, sabotaged resistance operations led by the communist resistance because he hated communists, loved colonies, and changed the whole government system to make it give more power to the president. He ignored the population, lied to them without giving a shit, encouraged violence in algeria, and the only actual good thing that he did (preventing the US and UK from stealing and invading France) was out of pride, and doesn’t compensate for anything else. But history is indeed written by the winners.

French people get taught in schools that (pseudo-) dictators like Louis XIV, Napoleon and De Gaulle, are the best kind of leaders and that France would be nothing without them. The president of France himself implied very strongly that he believes France needs a dictator, and he got reelected after that.

Clearly, protests that happened after the French revolution were not enough to do any meaningful change in the long run, as proven by the state of France now. Most people see protests as a nuisance, violent protests as terrorism, and antifascism as a hate crime. This antidemocratic wave got heavily promoted by Napoleon and De Gaulle, and the fact that these two are seen as heroes in France shows the perception that French people have.

There’s a reason why protests like the recent ones against Macron basically did nothing, despite being amongst the biggest protests of the past decades: most of the population is hostile to protests and revolts, and supports the idea of a fascist government

I don’t know why people have this illusion surrounding French people when they’re actively electing fascists and calling antifa a violent group of terrorists, while having their government give a minute of silence for the death of an actual nazi (like, actually posting on twitter that he loves Hitler -kind of nazi)

French people know nothing, they stopped understanding protests and revolts after Napoleon started shooting civilians with cannons and have been licking the boots of dictators since then. It’s no wonder that a bunch of them collaborated with the nazis back in ww2, and it’s no wonder they’re collaborating with the new nazis now.

Don’t use brave.

People really don’t know how to use a microwave.

Don’t take their comment as an attack. It actually doesn’t seem like a bad idea

Wait wait wait.

You are listening to people that you classify yourself of “red pill alpha guys” and you wonder why they’re saying shit?

So either you think that one can be that kind of guy, and not be a total garbage worthless piece of shit, which would mean that you’re part of them, or you have no idea what it means.

Maybe that’s the initial and core problem of your question.

Without any evidence, it is more likely for someone claiming they’ve been raped to be saying the truth, rather than to be humiliating themselves for a fake accusation.

You should believe rape victims (and not just women) whether there is evidence or not, because the way the world is right now makes it very unlikely for someone to make a fake accusation, while making it extremely hard for someone to legally prove that they’ve been raped. If someone is saying that they’ve been raped, in all likelihood they have been.

Everytime you decide to “first look at the evidence”, you pick the side of an unfair system. You should implicitly believe a rape victim, and then you can think about the evidence at your leisure.

Also, your strawman of changing “believe rape victims” into “believe everything a woman says without evidence” is a bit of a red flag. Might not have been intentional, so I’m telling you just in case.

But then everyone screams “innocent until proven guilty”

So many dumdums trying to gaslight their partners into thinking that it’s not cheating, it’s an open relationship.

If you have to convince your partner, it’s not an open relationship, it’s a toxic one.

It’s really no wonder most marriages end up in divorce, when I see the quality of the relationships I wonder how they lasted more than two weeks.

Yes, but the slippery slope is also a fallacy.

Caution is better than panic.

I love that this post is literally doing what it’s trying to criticize.

Also, I’ll give you satisfaction and say: if you feel the need to defend the fascists, you’re one of them, so go lick a nazi’s ass and fuck off.

Better title:

Astral products now defunct, SlopMachines make another victim.

It’s not a tool, it’s a chaos generator.

Don’t let people who build houses do it with cardboard boxes instead of bricks, even if it looks like a house in the end.

It’s funny how people are like “when I use my phone I feel depressed with all that his happening”, as if the phone is what is making them happen.