Ah yes, the typical far-right technique of mirroring attacks against them.
“We’re not antisemitic nazis, the leftists are, look at them criticizing Israel”.
“I’m colorblind, maybe you’re the racist one by focusing so much on color”
And whatnot.
Let me guess, next you’re going to start mentioning freedom of speech?
Machine learning is a tool that has been developed by educated people.
LLMs, not really.
And people using LLMs are doing it out of being uneducated because there is absolutely no good reason to use them
Yeah I want to beat up nazis, and if you feel bad for the nazis then guess which side that puts you in.
The point that you’re proving isn’t what you think it is.
Female has meanings that mean “female sex”, woman doesn’t.
Language influences and even if theoretically, female can mean woman, it still adds an implicit link to sex.
As you said, language is subjective, so even if a dictionary says that female can refer to women, in practice as someone else pointed out, you can talk about a female dog, you can’t talk about a woman dog.
I don’t know, using new pronouns can also sound clumsy, doesn’t mean it’s a bad idea.
The strong implicit links in language between sex and gender are not really helping anyone, and a bit of clumsiness for a while isn’t such a big cost.
I don’t know if that was the intention of the example you mentioned obviously.
A woman isn’t necessarily female.
What are you even saying? Are you drunk?
Yeah, go educate yourself a basic amount please.
That’s such a stupid take.
People who are “hostile” over social justice, are hostile against social injustice. Social injustice is violent, in many many ways.
Your take is basically “I don’t like these people, because they are violent against violence to try to fix it”. I’m sure that stagnating in violence is better than to try to fix it, huh.
Tell me that you’re a privileged brat without telling me that you’re a privileged brat.
Ah, web technologies and slop machines, now what’s not to love.
This post is literally about amending the rules to block the kind of shitty spam the discussion is about. Your argument is to not change the rules because there are already rules?
Yeah because when a place not only lacks content, but on top of that most of it is shitty spam, it makes people want to engage a lot more, right?
“Woman or male”
Gosh these questions never stop getting more and more stupid, this place really needs to be renamed “increasingly stupid questions”
So people still have absolutely not a single clue what “AIs” are and think that ChatGPT is a sentient android or something.
But then when you tell them to not kill or torture animals, the same people will refuse to acknowledge that they are sentient.
What a pathetic humanity.
And when it’s basically all websites, and you require those to make money, which you have to make or capitalism kills you, you’re out of options and it’s too late.
That’s a lot of ignorance.
The ban defines social media in an extremely broad way. It’s basically almost every website with a social aspect to it, comments under a news article would apply. Not only does it create a huge issue to have an unclear definition up to the interpretation of whomever will be taking advantage of it, it’s also not a good measure to protect anyone. Kids that are feeling isolated because of, for example, their gender, identity, or looks, and who were using social media anonymously as an escape, are the ones that will struggle.
And what do these bad effects cost? Massive, population-wide ID checks, that will need to be uploaded online, and France is soooo secure with their data breaches every ~3 days. So your ID information is in the wild, which will be heaven for hackers (who will consequently try even more to cause data breaches).
Social media are, in general, horrible. You want to make laws, make laws that extremely strictly ban all the shit that facebook, twitter and youtube and the likes do. Ban toxic algorithms (or algorithms altogether, no one needs anything else than a good search engine), make big platforms responsible for hate speech and actually punish them, and make it a huge, in-depth criminal investigation with extremely harsh punishments when a platform like Facebook is found to hide and protect pedocriminal rings. At the same time, increase education budgets a lot and teach kids how things work instead of letting them be thrown in the jungle with no clue what’s going on.
Also, you think that a 15-years old with no social media experience is going to be safe online? That’s doesn’t make sense. Make a 70 years old suddenly use the internet and they’ll also be lost, it’s not just about age but about technology literacy.
Let’s put professional fascists in a fascist birthplace to deter fascists from going there.
Uh.
Another typical far-right thing, building a strawman and going crazy on it.
I don’t want to punch people I disagree with, I want to punch nazis. The fact that you are getting so concerned by that is strange, because I am not scared of people who hunt nazis. It’s actually pretty easy to not be a nazi.
So the question really is, why are you so worried about the wellbeing of nazis?
And because I know what you’re going to say, what I consider a nazi is someone that wants to oppress minorities or goes against their existence. If you defend that, then you’re part of them.