• Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Everything they can do, a go-pro or adjacent camera would work without issue and with less ambiguity.

      The only reason you could possibly have for using them is to film people in secret. Like a pervert.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Everything they can do, a go-pro or adjacent camera would work without issue and with less ambiguity.

        So why aren’t we banning those for perverts too?

        • Remy@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Because if people work arround with a go-pro, its clear what they are doing

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            Disagree. Go-pros are easy to hide inside objects.

            The round camera holes in a thick eyeglass frame are much more obvious than a gauze covered lens.

            Sure, argue for the protection of children, but at least be consistent.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Tbh, I would love an appropriate pair. I have issues with memory, particularly regarding faces. A set of smart glasses would be an almost perfect aid to me.

      Unfortunately, I don’t trust any of the manufacturers not to abuse the hell out of all the data they generate. I’m also fully aware of the idiots abusing them, and ruining things for everyone else.