• Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Everything they can do, a go-pro or adjacent camera would work without issue and with less ambiguity.

    The only reason you could possibly have for using them is to film people in secret. Like a pervert.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Everything they can do, a go-pro or adjacent camera would work without issue and with less ambiguity.

      So why aren’t we banning those for perverts too?

      • Remy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Because if people work arround with a go-pro, its clear what they are doing

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Disagree. Go-pros are easy to hide inside objects.

          The round camera holes in a thick eyeglass frame are much more obvious than a gauze covered lens.

          Sure, argue for the protection of children, but at least be consistent.