• Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    206
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it’s “an honest bump” to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

    Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Might as well bump it to 64 GB and an LLM chip since in 5 years’ time people might like Copilot & Friends spying a bit less on them.

    • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      But that’s not honest.

      Ubuntu’s default browser, and other apps, are snap-based. They take significantly more resourced than their Debian counterparts.

        • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          If a snap is bundled with it’s own dependencies (the point of snap), those dependency libraries are not loaded into shared memory. Multiple apps that would typically share a loaded dependency must now each load them into RAM.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Web browsing is the real murder here… and i dont want to know how much memory is solely spent on ads

      • grinde@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The week after GDPR went into effect was amazing. Almost nobody was ready, so they just turned off all their ads and tracking for European IPs while they figured it out. Pages loaded pretty much instantly.

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I thought ad blockers just blocked ads from showing, not that they stopped them from being downloaded…

          • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            No, if it’s a good blocker it’s blocking all requests and connections to wherever the ads are being served from. There’s usually ALSO a level of cosmetic filtering for things that get past the blocklist or can’t be properly filtered because they’re coming from the same server as stuff you actually want to see, but with ublock origin set to strict and noscript set to allow only whitelisted sites, my page load times are way faster. Sometimes a shitty webpage will still ‘wait around’ for a second to try and get a connection from an ad site but it’s not loading anything into memory.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows

      so use a lighter-weight de (xfce, lxqt, budgie), and don’t go crazy with brower tabs or open applications, and you’ll be ok… like you’re probably already doing now if you’ve got a ‘marginal’ pc.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m concerned about in-system bloat because I read the linked article.

      Rather, it’s more of an honesty bump. Components that make up the distro – the GNOME desktop and extensions, modern web browsers (and the sites we load in them) and the kinds of apps we use (and keep running) whilst multitasking are more demanding.

      The desktop itself isn’t the only reason that you need more RAM, but it’s definitely one of them.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I totally get it but with the current rampocalypse I’d delay it just for the optics alone