• x0x7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This is why I’m going to argue for pure Arch or Artix. Ultimately, what a lot of these distros bring to the table is artwork. But they bite off a lot more than artwork when doing so. And in time they can start to suck at that administration.

    It’s not very hard to set up your system with a vanilla DE and adjust it into something good. You don’t need to get fancy. And to the extent someone else’s art work can be good and accelerate getting to a nice system, there are other ways to distribute that.

    You should want your distro to be 95% administration and 5% art because in the long run that’s whats going to keep your system stable and avoid future headaches. But some artists are overly ambitious and envision creating an entire version of an operating system, including the parts they aren’t passionate about. And some people buy in on this premise and install these projects. …instead of just releasing dot files.

    For it to go well requires that both the leadership and the contributors are passionate about all of the parts and passionate about them forever. Not very likely. If you want a distro that is administered well, get a distro where administration is all they do, and then get your artwork as a separate selection.

    Now you can get your art from artists who put 95% of their effort into art. And your package stability by people who put 95% of their effort into package stability.

    Everyone has romantic feelings toward a system that is integrated. But what they should realize is that integrated and modular are opposites. And modular is what they should want, with effective roll separation.

    If they fork Majaro that is good. If when they fork it they scope down to just distribute a dot file set, and maybe create their own easy installer for Arch that isn’t a seperate whole distro, that is better.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I moved back to a debian based distro and it’s basically the same. Doesn’t really matter which one you use

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Did I just find next distro to try? :) Kudos to them anyway (yay, that’s the kind of news I want to hear)

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    As others suggest, why stay attached to Manjaro at all? Instead of forking, what about expending that energy on a rising distro without such reputational damage?

    CachyOS is very close “in spirit” if they want to develop modified/custom packages, but there are plenty Arch downstream distros with less toxic communities.

    They could even fork some other project and make the changes they like. It’d be a saner base than Manjaro at this point.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    The fact that CachyOS more or less successfully replaced Manjaro’s purpose I guess is evidence of Manjaro’s issues.

    I forgot but I think Bazzite had similar complaints (due to its use of silverblue) in which case it was just more straightforward to use Fedora or OpenSUSE if you don’t want to work with the read only root system.

    Downstream distros need to bring additional value to the table to be worth using, otherwise there’s really no need if you can make a package group that accomplishes the same thing in one go.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I had been using Pop-os for about a year but wasn’t completely happy with it. A friend suggested Bazzite and, to me, it was a lot better in some ways and worse in others. I’ve since switched to Fedora and don’t really have any complaints. I don’t plan on switching again baring something I don’t see coming.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Aragorn writes that Philip Müller (the project lead) has been running Manjaro as his own personal venture rather than a community effort, keeping a tight hold on access to both the codebase and the infrastructure.

    These weasels never care about the actual thing that is being built, its just a way to make money for them.

    Hope they kick that Philip guy out and get back to making this a passion project.

    The core members with passion for the actual thing should restart under a new name.

      • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I had to check boxes for gaming packages specifically to get installed. It’s an extremely fast Arch fork first and foremost, with gaming features second.

        I thought it’d be gaming first too but it was clear during install that’s more of an “oh also”.

        • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          yeah, but me switching from EndeavourOS to CachyOS, what tangible benefits am I realistically going to gain? if all I do is use Firefox and play music/movies? ya know?

  • zewm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly the damage is done. Manjaro has been an instant no from me dog for a long time. The name carries a negative connotation. Trust has eroded.

      • Addv4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Plenty of things, but the most obvious being the two separate instances they had issues with renewing their certs.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Could you please explain why not renewing their certs is such a serious betrayal? Like, if they fixed it, isn’t that okay? And even if it happened again, and they fixed it again, isn’t it human to err? Or why is it such a harsh offense?

          Serious question, I don’t know the consequences of not renewing these certs. 😊

          • Addv4@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s the tls certificate that proves your website is legit. Without which, you can potentially be a malicious actor that can pose as the website, and when you download the iso, you could unknowingly download something malicious. It’s pretty hard to forget certificate renewal (most of the time there are plenty of reminders sent and warnings given), so the fact that it happened twice was very impressively bad.

            • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s pretty hard to forget certificate renewal (most of the time there are plenty of reminders sent and warnings given)

              Oh boy. Seems to be the opposite in real life. Especially when it comes to managing stored cert of businesses partners. It has gotten somewhat better now of course, but three years ago most of my company’s sev1 production issues were due to lapsing or unscheduled cert changes.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    The only reason I went with manjaro this last time is because I had my arch Linux install adventure already and I just wanted my computer to work. is there an install script that just works now?

    • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is archinstall which does everything for you. If you don’t wanna do anything yourself though, just check out CachyOS or EndeavourOS

      • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I just switched from Bazzite to Cachy today. For some reason my disk space got… clogged, with Bazzite? Filelight was no help so I backed everything up, wiped the disk, installed Cachy, replaced my files, and the disk went from being nearly full to only using 600GB. Still not sure what happened there.

        Cachy, meanwhile, has asked me to update 4 times in the 4 hours I’ve been using it. Which is fine, I get that Arch is rolling release, but now on the 4th update it keep failing for some reason. Also I can’t have my headphones and speakers plugged in at the same time or my speakers don’t work.

        Sigh. All this KDE stuff is nice and flashy, and my games have worked with both Bazzite and Cachy, so I appreciate that, but damn is it tough for me to make a Linux recommendation to anyone else that isn’t just “use Mint, it’s stable.” Anything more in depth turns into a mini essay (see above!)

        • Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          The tool gdu is very nice for finding space culprits.

          Never used Bazzite, but isn’t it heavy on packaged apps with snap or flatpak? Inherently space inefficient (and I despise them both passionately).

          Don’t update all the time. I update every couple of days like a maniac, but once every few weeks is fine too.

          There’s a distro for every level of “I want to do it myself” vs “I want everything to be made ready for me”.

          • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s flatpak. Not snap, by god, not snap.

            It’s inefficient, but he is stating that he is now using “only 600GB”, so I would guess it shouldn’t be that notable to someone who thinks 600GB is not much.

            I used to dislike it, but consider that Flatpak is allowing a lot of small distros to exist outside of Debian/RHEL/Arch. Void, Chimera, Adélie or Guix (insert yours here) “only” have to implement a desktop environment and Flatpak to be usable. It’s not ideal and it kind of goes against the point of those distros, but they definitely couldn’t package Flathub’s 3300 apps themselves. Especially the proprietary ones that only provide a .deb and .rpm.

            Also the sandboxing is nice when installing proprietary stuff. I don’t want Microsoft Team drooling all over my stuff.

            • BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Oh, I didn’t realize how unclear that was. The disk is a 2TB NVME SSD. I searched and searched, even booted into Mint on another disk and tried to search from there, and could only find a few hundred GB worth of files (probably about 600GB if I had to guess, lol). I genuinely have no idea what could have been taking up nearly 1.4TB of space, so that’s all I meant when I said “only.”

              My suspicion is that something was going wrong whenever I deleted anything. Maybe for some reason the data just weren’t going anywhere, even though the trash was empty and they were no longer showing up in their old locations. Hence the term “clogged.” No similar issues with Cachy just yet, though.

              • Qwel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 hours ago

                So, yeah, flatpak is horribly inneficient on disk usage and can easily take 60GB if you are a bit generous on app installs. 60GB is, notably, less than 1.4TB

                Out of curiosity, how did you search for what was using up the space? Did you try apps like baobab or filelight? One of them is usually preinstalled and they have not failed me yet (except when hard-linking or copy-on-write is involved, but that shouldn’t show up on the global disk usage percentage)

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          You probably had snapper making tons of backups. You can open up btrfs assistant and delete some old snapper backups to make room.

          • Maiq@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Set up the snapper-timeline.timer and set snapshots to only snap on update/remove of packages with snap-pac. Also from the arch wiki,

            Create subvolumes for things that are not worth being snapshotted, like /var/cache/pacman/pkg, /var/abs, /var/tmp, and /srv.
            
              • Maiq@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                Garuda Linux -> https://garudalinux.org/

                Just checked the fstab on my tablet and they have subvolumes for root, home, srv, cache, log and tmp. I also have snap-pac installed and not sure if it’s installed by default but I assume it is. Their KDE is awesome! Very polished. They have really taken the time to make arch easy.

                They have all sorts of aliases in the .bashrc that are there to make transitioning to arch a little less daunting to the average user. Things like reflector to stay current with mirrorlists.

                The have warnings when something is wrong during updates with instructions how to fix, taking care of conflicts during updates, fixing pacman lock, garuda-update remote fix to restore pacman to their default’s. Chaotic AUR might be installed by default, not sure it’s been a long while since I installed. Great setup assistant, and installer. btrfs-assistant and eza setup. Might want to install and set up meld to handle pacdiff in the .bashrc alias pacdiff="sudo -H DIFFPROG=meld pacdiff"

                If you want easyarch Garuda is it. If you want a real arch experience without having to go through the manual install process, endeavour or archinstall is the way to go. You might have to setup btrfs and snapper the way you want it manually though. Im not sure about endeavour as I haven’t used it in a while. It’s pretty easy to do though.

    • redsand@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      No. Let Manjaro die. It has no reason to exist in any form. Go contribute to something useful.

      • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Is Garuda a serious distro? Last I heard it was basically a few people’s hobby project. Not to say one shouldn’t use it, but I don’t know if it’s on par with EOS and Cachy.

        • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          All community distros are someone‘s hobby.

          Garuda has a very different focus than Cachy. Both are some extras on top of Arch.

    • rhubarbe@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Except that I want the same release cycle as Manjaro. The only equivalent I have found so far seems to be OpenSuse Slowroll, in beta for the past 2 years.