cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44856828

As the war in Iran pushes U.S. gas prices toward $4 a gallon nationally, some lawmakers are pushing to suspend the federal gasoline tax in the latest attempt to try to control surging energy costs.

Lawmakers say the action would provide much-needed relief for families and businesses that rely on their cars and trucks to get to work and school and run everyday errands.

Asked about the gas tax at a Cabinet meeting Thursday, Donald Trump said he has “thought about” suspending it but suggested states should consider suspending their fuel taxes.

  • Screamium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    If only people didn’t need to commute to an office 3-5 days a week! Gee, if only that was proven to work at scale for multiple years!

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    2 days ago

    The fact that states are thinking of pausing the tax just pisses my EV driving ass off. Here they made registration more expensive for EVs because “we don’t pay gas tax” so if they suspend it what are the chances we EV drivers get a refund? I bet its less than zero.

    Meanwhite the drivers of the polluters and gas guzzlers get a discound to continue to pollute. They should be making EVs more desirable by having no tax or extra fees, make others jealous and have FOMO.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      The EV fees are a very stupid solution to a real policy issue.

      They should change it to a fee by vehicle weight, based on road wear caused. This means the vast majority of road maintenance will be paid for by the groups that actually cause it: trucking companies.

      We can keep gas taxes as a fee for poisoning everyone.

      • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trucking companies will be very happy to pass that cost along to you, esteemed final consumer.

        Road infrastructure is already heavily subsidized by the taxpayers, which in the US is basically the same as saying drivers, so I don’t see how that changes anything.

        • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          The point is that it would force trucking companies to make choices that consider effects on the road infrastructure.

          Do I continue shipping pretty much everything in trucks as big as possible? Or do I consider smaller trucks for shorter distances? Maybe I should hire developers to determine the most cost-efficient system of paths by small trucks and large trucks? What if I used trains or ships for some long distance travels? Would that make sense? Etc.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    US is burning through cash at a unprecedented rate and nobody seems to be talking about it.

  • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember how some car drivers get mad about cyclists because they feel like cyclists don’t pay for roads because bikes don’t pay gas tax?

  • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Federal government should not be allowed to directly tax anything. All should go through the states. This direct taxation is how we are stuck in this Nazi Feudalust situation.

  • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I was under the impression that gas taxes paid for roads, in that case how do they plan to fund all the road maintenance that decades of overfunding road construction while underfunding transit has created a need for?

    • grue@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      LOL, nope. Gas tax revenue is only a small fraction of the cost of road maintenance.

      The notion that drivers are paying their fair share is just a lie carbrains claim in order to bully cyclists.

      • @grue @Armok_the_bunny But with that said, as gas taxes do pay for some of road maintenance and expansion and the politicians in power (from both parties but especially Republicans) will never get over their addiction to reckless highway expansion, any temporary or permanent cuts to gas tax will be accompanied by efforts to end federal funding for transit as well as any facilities at all for people to walk and bike safely on roads.

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That tax argument has never really made sense to me. As an avid cyclist, I don’t know anyone that owns a bike but doesn’t also own a car. I’m sure they exist in big cities, but I’ve never met them.

        • grue@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s not meant to make sense; it’s meant to sound ‘truthy’ (which is not the same as ‘truthful’) enough to serve as an excuse try to attack cyclists as not deserving to use the road.

          The reality is, road wear and tear goes up with the fourth power of vehicle weight. If cyclists were taxed 1¢ and other road users were taxed fairly and proportionally, the average sedan driver would be taxed thousands of dollars, and 18-wheeler drivers would be taxed millions.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Who wants to bet when the cut the taxes that the companies will just pocket the difference. Same as the tariffs. All these things supposed to be helping normal people end up helping the already rich. So weird. /s