Drove from NoVA to the NW part of SC today in my 22 Bolt EUV. I used ABRP to route to chargers and put the addresses into Google maps to check reviews and GPS me there. The car is J1772/CCS, but I bought an adapter ahead of time to make use of Tesla/NACS chargers.

Unfortunately, this car only has a max charge rate of 55kW, so my refueling stops are either more frequent or longer than I would like, but I don’t do road trips often and this car was half the price of the ioniq I wanted.

I had one issue today. A Tesla supercharger I stopped at just wouldn’t initialize the charge. I even tried plugging into another one right next to it, but no dice. I’ve since learned that V2 superchargers won’t work with my car even with an adapter, so I guess that’s what that one was? I have no way of knowing. ABRP and Google maps don’t specify. Maybe the Tesla app does? Thankfully, there was an Electric America charger just a couple miles away, but I was pretty stressed out since I was pretty well drained and didn’t know where I was.

The hotel we’re at has level 2 chargers, so I shouldn’t need to deal with unfamiliar chargers again until we head back to NoVA. In the meantime, I’ve deselected NACS chargers from my ABRP vehicle options. It’s possible that my adapter just died after only a few successful uses, but the location I had an issue with had a review of somebody else being unable to charge, so I think it’s just that V2 issue.

In summary, the difference has been that it takes a little longer, it takes a little more planning and preparing, and there is a risk of some anxiety, but it’s easier to drive, less chance of “car trouble” events, and especially right now it is significantly cheaper to refuel. But get something that accepts at least 100kW charging lol. I think the ioniq does like 240kW? With that, you basically plug in, use the bathroom, grab a coffee, and you’re ready to go.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah… Reasons I won’t buy a fully electric vehicle in their current state:

    1. Slow charge times
    2. Low ranges
    3. Risk of severe fire, shortages, or damages from an accident (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352152X25032724)
    4. High initial cost (even often with incentives or rebates
    5. Often times lack of serviceability in certain areas
    6. A lot of the grid power still based on fossil fuels or coal
    7. Extremely heavy compared to traditional ICE cars

    What needs to happen before better widespread adoption (IMO):

    1. Sodium ion battery adoption (or similar) that has similar A. energy density, B. better capacity, C. faster charging, D. longer range
    2. Better hybrid technology like Turbo diesel electric (similar to trains as a generator or electric assisted engine since diesel already get great MPG like the Jetta in the US)
    3. Propane-based generator so no need to “charge”
    4. Better grid supplementation with more renewables
    5. Possible “hot swap” battery packs that are charged and ready to go

    I would love a Honda Accord Sport Hybrid so I don’t need to charge it but still get 50ish MPG. It’s a kind of happy medium with space, weight, no charging much lower emissions.

    Can’t wait to see a Sodium Ion battery hybrid and how that does since it’s capable of “charging faster”, so I wonder if somehow it could use more battery assist while using engine momentum and/or regenerative braking to recoup energy quicker- which in turn gives even higher potential ranges. I’m hoping for 70mpg+ in a mid-size sedan! 🤞

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A lot of the grid power still based on fossil fuels or coal

      Even if you of a long tailpipe emissions analysis of pure coal power, the total emissions are still lower than a comparable gasoline powered engine.

      Coal emits about 2.31 lbs (1.05 kg) of carbon dioxide per kwh.

      Gasoline emits about 20 lbs (8.9 kg) of carbon dioxide per gallon burned.

      So a car that gets 3.5 miles per kWh and is purely charged on coal emits about 0.3 kg of carbon per mile. A car that runs on gasoline and gets 30 miles per gallon is about the same.

      In comparison, natural gas is about 0.96lbs of CO2 per kWh, so that EV charged on natural gas would emit roughly the same as a 74 mile per gallon vehicle.

      Note that currently, in the US, coal is about 16% of electricity production, and natural gas is 41%. If you compare the emissions to the overall mix, you’ll get even lower numbers for the EV emissions.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Sodium ion battery adoption (or similar) that has similar A. energy density, B. better capacity, C. faster charging, D. longer range

      Sodium batteries have a lot of advantages and will make a huge difference when they are widely available.

      But so far, power density is not one of those advantages. The technology has a great chance of taking over the bulk of EVs from LFP batteries. However longer range vehicles are (currently) using other chemistries with higher power density. We can’t know where the market will head but so far Sodium batteries are not likely for longer range EVs

    • nublug@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      incredibly confusing* comment.

      it’s too heavy? grid power fossil fuels? did you use ai to make this list? actually, i kinda hope you did, because yikes. ‘often times lack of servicability in certain areas’? what the fuck are you even saying? you want a propane based generator but lament grid fossil fuels? bro, this is utter nonsense.

      *edit: original unnecessarily harsh, apologies.

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Clearly you’re a city dweller who doesn’t understand people don’t all live in or near a major city smh.

        A. Yes, apparently you didn’t realize that electric vehicle are often significantly heavier due to the massive battery packs. Look up the GMC Hummer weight, Cybertruck, even the Model Y is over 4000lbs (1891kg). This stresses smaller roads or did streets that aren’t built for the additional weight (some trucks surpassing 6000lbs) as well as the higher cost of special tires to handle the load and replacing more often.

        B. Yes, not only are a lot of power plants burning fossil fuels, Trump rolled back regulations on coal, oil, and Natural gas, so they’re being used A LOT more now. Not everything is wind, solar, hydro, or nuclear. OH, also, xAI is using jet turbines to power its AI data centers in TX. I think it’s over 30 now. Task about a waste of fossil fuel… LPG, btw, is a by-product of the refining of natural gas, but burns far cleaner than oil with a lot less emissions. It could function as a direct oil replacement. If you ever rent a truck from Home Depot or Lowes, many of this are converted to propane to be cheaper to refuel.

        C. Fuck no did I use AI for that list.

        D. I had a customer buy an all electric KIA or Hyundai model a few years ago and when her battery had issues, the nearest dealer was over 50 miles away that has a certified tech to work on it. She eventually got the dealer to trade it back and got the hybrid. Now yes, this was a few years ago 2023) but still, not interested until other areas have improved.

        So no, not utter nonsense, you’re just not educated or understand anything outside you’re little bubble.

          • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            He’s just fishing for excuses, they always default to an anecdotal story about a guy with an EV that is fabricated.

            • MBech@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I have talked to a bunch of mechanics through the years. All of them told me to not buy an EV, because they once got one into their shop with a fucked battery, that cost a lot to replace. They seemingly don’t understand survivorship bias (or I suppose the opposite) when it’s an EV. Same people have seen brand new engines rendered completely useless, but no. It’s always a single broken battery that’s their reason for never owning an EV…

            • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Right, my story about the Hyundai was TOTALLY fabricated, you’re so right! Definitely not a real-life run-in while working in the insurance world dealing with 100s of customers on a monthly basis.

              Here’s another made up one just for fun and rather irrelevant. A guy had his Tesla serviced at work (I guess they came out to him bc there’s no dealership technically?) and noticed when he got back to his car, it was in a different spot. Customer asked how it drove and the tech said he didn’t need to drive it. Confused, the customer asked why his car was moved then and the tech got a little defensive. Customer dropped it, not wanting to cause trouble.

              Comes in to my office a few days later, says he noticed some damage to his car, and tried to check camera footage, all of it was erased, like, nothing at all left. Called tesla and asked about recovering recordings and the data and they’re no help. Says impossible. 2nd level tech “restores” it and gives him a download link. Customer manages to get on flash drive but not know how to use it. Asked for help while filing a claim. All the video was for the complete wrong dates. In the end, no claim filed as there’s no real evidence or proof, and didn’t want to claim hit-and-run at work, either. I don’t recall, but idk if there was a way to check daily mileage on the app or something as proof more miles were driven on one day than another.

              So basically tech took for a drive, caused damage, flees, parks it in wrong spot, wipes any video evidence, plays dumb. I think it’s super shady of Tesla to give techs remote access to get in anyone’s car, plus, I mean it’s run by a psycho pedo, so…

              I enjoy my privacy, I enjoy keeping big brother at a distance. I am decently versed in both IT and insurance and knowing all the data these companies have on us is disgusting. I might even go as far as any “new” car to me, requesting any modems or eSIM be deactivated.

        • urandom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          B: so you’d rather have pollution at the plant and at home (though your car), rather than just at the plant? Got it

          • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            No, I’d rather not destroy the grid with the lack of support for ask these BEVs, depleting rare lithium, and work to resolve issues a stated above. Charging, OP pointed out, is at least greatly improved. But I don’t think several million cars/trucks, etc needing to tax the grid along with issues trying to support data centers, is the right path. Ask that means is the cost of electricity would sharply rise as everyone become dependent on that.

            Overall, I think we need to focus on improving batteries, charging capability, and self a sufficient-ish with a hybrid system of sorts. Personally, I live in a truck and large SUV area and it freaking annoys me everyone buys stupidly large cars. New truck hoods are the height of my roof of my sedan. I wish people would go back to smaller more economical vehicles.

            • urandom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Your original point was about pollution. Now it suddenly shifted to the grid infrastructure and the rare (one of the most common elements on earth…) lithium.

              Thanks. I’ve heard enough.

        • nublug@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A: complete non-issue.

          B: entirely separate fight from ev vs ice vehicles. xai running methane generators doesn’t fuel evs anyway, why bring that up like it’s relevant? you choosing ice over ev isn’t helping the problem, either. and even if the only way we had to make electricity at all was fossil fuels, evs would still be more effiicient because power plants run huge generators at stable rates for peak efficiencies for far more power per unit of fossil fuel even accounting for power conversion loss. you also save on transporting tanker trucks of gas vs electricity over power lines.

          C: good, but also yikes.

          D: okay, this one is valid. it just made no sense as you first wrote it. still a minor inconvenience especially considering how fewer moving parts means far less often maintenance in the first place. and it’s another area like charging stations that has rapidly become more and more of a non-issue as adoption of the tech spreads.

          i’ll give a pass on the insulting, as i regrettably went there first.

    • MrVilliam@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ll start by saying thank you for commenting; I don’t want you to feel attacked just for engaging and giving your opinion. While your opinion is your opinion, I think there are details that can make you a little more open to EV adoption sooner rather than later, but less to convince you and more to care less because it’s really not the terrible decision you seem to think it is.

      For nearly every situation, your list of issues is irrelevant:

      1. Current gen higher voltage EVs (kia/Hyundai) charge in barely more time than it takes to pump gas. But even that doesn’t really matter because with the exception of this unusual road trip, I’m charging at home while I sleep. No need to even make a stop anywhere. It’s also stupid cheap to charge at home. Literally about 20% cost in terms of dollars per mile compared to gas.
      2. Ranges are getting better all the time. I have a much longer commute than most people at about 90 miles round trip. But I can plug in at home. The only time range really matters is for road trips, and if you do that a lot for whatever reason, either get used to waiting, don’t buy an EV, or rent an ICE vehicle for road trips. But I’m proving to myself that road trips are feasible even with a lower range, lower voltage EV.
      3. Yeah, fires are a concern. And also fires are a concern for ICE vehicles carrying explosive fuel. It’s silly to pretend that there’s a significant difference here.
      4. I got a used 2022 with 50k miles for $19k. The cost has come down. Just stop looking at luxury/sports trims.
      5. What serviceability? The only regular service needed is tires, brakes, lights, and wipers. And with regen braking, your friction brakes get minimal use.
      6. This is true, but because of how it scales it’s significantly more green to charge a thousand EVs with a combined cycle gas plant than to put gas into a thousand gas cars.
      7. I’m not gonna pretend that EVs aren’t heavier, and I’m not even saying that 20% heavier isn’t a lot. But it’s not like they’re 50-100% heavier. My EV is slightly smaller than my RAV4 was, but it feels about the same weight. I guess I don’t see the point of this point? The weight difference is like having two or three adults in the back seat. I don’t think most people drive differently in that situation.

      Your wish list isn’t really realistic or necessary. I’d argue that widespread adoption has already happened. But I’ll check each item:

      1. Already addressed. Range and charge times are fine for almost everybody almost all of the time. Working on this wouldn’t be a bad idea, but if it costs significantly more to get an extra 100 miles of range, who is willing to pay for it?
      2. Why would better hybrid tech lead to more EV adoption? I’m not against having this as an option, but it’s way more headache than just an EV would be.
      3. Propane based charging? Like having a generator with gas on board? You’re describing a plug in hybrid and they’re not great.
      4. I’m all for more renewables. Have market pricing roll out, and normalize home battery backups instead of backup generators and we’ll flatten the duck curve in no time. Charge home and car overnight and sip home battery power during the day.
      5. This is what it would take to replace occupational vehicles like trucks, but I think it’s a waste of time and money to even think about this for the average driver. If 200+kV or maybe one day double that become the norm, then there’s no way that a battery hot swap could be faster and safer than just charging. I can’t stress this enough: current gen kia/hyundai EVs charge from 10% to 80% in 18 minutes with a range well over 300 miles. So you charge at home to 100%, drive FIVE HOURS STRAIGHT, charge for 18 minutes, and you can go another four hours. That 18 minute charge time is passive while you run in to poop and order a sandwich. The range/charge time problem has been solved!

      To be clear, as I’ve said before elsewhere, it does not make sense to buy an EV unless you can charge at home. And it might not make sense to switch unless you already need a new vehicle. I opted to sell my RAV4 because it was still in great shape and was therefore still worth a lot. I sold my 2016 RAV4 with like 70k miles for $14k and got my 2022 Bolt EUV with 50k miles for $19k. It cost me $5k. Great deal. And this road trip is the only time I’ve ever needed to stop and charge anywhere but home. This is the stress test, and it’s barely an inconvenience, even with my below average range and charge speed.

      I don’t expect to change your mind. If it doesn’t work for your lifestyle, I don’t think anything will ever or should ever change your mind. If you just don’t trust it for whatever reason, nobody is pushing you to choose it, but I think that a lot of your concerns here aren’t or at least shouldn’t be concerns. The more I was reading up on this before making a decision for myself, the more I saw that it really doesn’t take much to make the change, and it’s a net benefit for almost everybody to do so. Ironically, cities are where it doesn’t work because of lagging charge-at-home options, but that’s okay because cities tend to have good buses and trains. Speaking of which…

      EVs are the half measure. A lot of people think that hybrids are the half measure, but they’re really not. We should be aiming for public transportation for local stuff like shopping and commuting, and low cost high speed rail for long distance to replace road trips. There is absolute no reason why we can’t expect our country to make this a reality. Our car-obsessed culture and infrastructure is poisoning us, killing us, stunting our economic and cultural growth.

      It won’t be long before the chokehold on the strait of Hormuz ripples to increased shipping costs, rippling to even more “supply chain” price hikes. Oil is a limited resource, and it’s probably a good idea to transition away where we pretty easily can. Medical grade plastics are harder to replace than oil and gas for our cars, and our addiction-like dependence on oil for every little thing is making us vulnerable to fragile bottlenecks. Without getting too deep into politics, if the current events of this year along with gas prices aren’t enough to encourage people to look more closely into how EVs could work in their lives, then those people will probably dig their heels in and pay $10/gallon before acknowledging that they’re holding out for a Grand Canyon road trip that’s getting harder and harder to afford in the first place.

      Maybe some of your concerns have been massaged, and maybe you’ll be ready to reevaluate again within the next couple years. Idk, it’s your choice and only you know what your personal needs are, but I hate to see oil/gas talking points propagating without clarification or challenge. A lot of people believe it and repeat it, but the raw numbers and testimony unravel the vast majority of it. I encourage anybody who wants to understand this better to check out the YouTube channels Climate Town and Technology Connections. They discuss other stuff too, but most EV focused channels I’ve seen are either too dry or are generally unconvincing. Like one channel said that it’s more efficient in an EV to accelerate quickly up to cruising speed, but aside from maybe miniscule savings in terms of time spent on climate control, I just don’t see it.

      Apologies for the absurdly long comment!

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Oh, Bolt, OK so it must’ve been the Volt that was “electric” but when the battery was low it ran a small gas generator to generate electric to extend the range iirc. To me, that’s still more or less hybrid as you’re using a combination of energy sources. So my thought was propane that burns cleaner could replaced that gas engine to be better overall. With the better batteries and improved engineering on engines, I could see 70+miles becoming achievable. The hope is that adoption grows enough, cutting dependency on oil, and a demand drops, so would the price of oil.

        That’s good about the charging faster, I didn’t realize charge speeds were that improved so that’s good.

    • Bell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve driven as far as NE Florida to Birmingham and Fla to Maryland in my Tesla. On a long trip, I basically have to take 30 or 40 minutes to charge after 3 or 4 hours of driving. This is fine with me. 98% of my driving is when I’ve charged at home.

      With an EV, I’m also trading for a vehicle with: 1/10 the number of moving parts, basically zero maintenance besides tires, no noise, no emissions, and no gas to buy. EVs are not at all perfect but they are way smarter than ICE vehicles right now.

      • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Glad you’re an expert. I don’t like oil any more than most, it’s just not logical for a lot of the country right now. Live in a city, sure, a lot of short distance driving. Many are not so fortunate for the pros to outweigh the cons yet.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not going into detail of all the assumptions you made but let me just say there’s statistically a huge amount of combustion cars burning every day. It’s just normalized.