• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is precisely why US public transport is stuck in the 1800s. And why EU public transport is stuck in 1950s.

    All while China has public transport from 2030s and nearly more subway railways (by total length) than the rest of the world combined. Of course, this is not meant to glaze China. Just to give credit for building public transport without a profit incentive.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s worse than the 1800s. We used to have an expansive rail network. We had, at the peak, 400,000 or so miles of rail in the US. Today there is less than 140,000 miles of rail. Less than half of what we used to have. Sure, we’ve got more buses and light rail like subway, but overall it’s still a loss in total miles.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    “it’s not profitable”

    “that’s ok, I’m not looking to make profit, I’m willing to ride it for free.”

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Mass transportation should drop the pretenses of being a business and stop demanding a fare from people riding it.

    That would solve a lot of problems, and make the system way cheaper.

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Neoliberals: Correct. That’s why the only possible way to have HSR is if you give the railroads infinite land to develop and interest free loans. Then if you’re lucky, they’ll subsidize the unprofitable railroads by renting out the most expensive land in the city as exorbitant rates! Or maybe they’ll cut rail service and raise ticket prices anyway! Shame there’s no alternative.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      A nice private-public partnership, with a contract guaranteeing profits for the private investors and the public pays for it through taxes.

  • TwilitSky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    IS this accurate, though?
    Anyone who lives in or knows Europe is well aware that it’s much cheaper and faster to fly over HSR on that continent. If you have time and don’t feel like dealing with airports/planes, the train is a preferable option, but it comes at more cost.

    • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Isn’t Airplane Kerosene heavily subsidized here? I feel like trains would be cheaper if they were given a fair chance.

      • falcunculus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Airplane fuel is basically untaxed worldwide due to the Chicago convention. But also infrastructure costs for HSR are very high and scale with distance whereas the opposite is true for planes.

        • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          In Germany, HSR also has to pay fees to use the rails (while cars get to use roads for free). Plus there is always a push to make it profitable, which results in constant rising prices.

  • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Vote with your wallet! Destroy something an auto industry shill loves today!

    Organs pets and spouses do count.

  • Rolder@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember watching some videos about the rail in Japan. The rail itself wasn’t really profitable, but the rail company also own the land around the exits. Because of more sane zoning laws, it can actually be used too. And they make fuckin bank leasing out that prime real estate.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Which is why Shinkansen tickets are like 5x more expensive than in China. Also why every city has like 10 different transit companies with transfers that can mean “walk 2 blocks on the surface”. Under capitalism, the ideal railroad makes infinite money while running zero trains and owning zero infrastructure. You literally need to use legal means to get them to deviate from this.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Say what you will but their train system works smooth like butter. When I visited I used the local metro around Tokyo and it was very affordable. Didn’t get a chance to ride the Shinkansen though so no direct comment on that.