• gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    ???

    People have been really hyped for space x, when they first landed a booster and now when they do test launches of Starship and when they caught the super heavy booster it was incredible.

    People care about Artemis II because it’s crewed spaceflight to the moon. Artemis I didn’t get nearly as much attention.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Right. The physics, material, and chemical discoveries, and engineering solutions just disappears afterwards, and all the salaries paid out just zap out of existence after feeding and housing the people involved.

      Scientific discovery is something that costs resources, once.

      And as long as you don’t delete the results, they pay themselves back for the literal rest of human history. Which we can at least hope, will be a very long time.

  • Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Ok I’m going to be that guy who sounds like a musk fanboy but rest assured I fucking hate that Nazi. That said, people don’t care about spacex launches because they have become so routine as to be boring.in a historical context there came a point where people stopped caring about airplanes because they stopped crashing. This is good. Rockets becoming reliable enough to become boring and routine is a net gain for humanity. I just wish spacex weren’t owned by that goose stepping fascist

    • gurty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Agreed. I think people need to understand that Musk isn’t a scientist, he’s just the money. The actual people working at SpaceX are doing great stuff.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Youngsters don’t realize that people became fucking bored with the Apollo missions after 11. Apollo 13 generated some buzz because the crew was probably going to die, but that’s it. Same thing happened with the space shuttle.

    • DaGreenGobbo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be into SpaceX if it were owned by the nicest capitalist on Earth. I just want one thing to be free from capitalist exploitation. Swiftly followed by everything else.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Well also personally I lost interest because I got sick of Elon time. I’m pretty sure by his estimate we were supposed to have megastructures by now.

      It’s also worth noting that reusable rockets are interesting but if they just go up deploy satellite and then come back down that’s not very interesting compared to going to the moon.

      I know SpaceX are supposed to be building a lunar lander but we’ve heard nothing about that for years now. Where is it, Artemis III is going to need it in less than a year. Have they even started construction?

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure by his estimate we were supposed to have megastructures by now.

        This exactly. Musk has been talking ginormic shit for decades, and delivered peanuts. Destroying the USA in the process.

        How good is the re-usability even going? That’s the only plus I see wrt SpaceX.

    • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      boring

      Another E Musk company. (sorry, couldn’t resist)

      But isn’t “going further than ever before (humaned)” a bit different from “launching another dozen or so satellites into orbit”?

    • Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      We stopped the space exploration shit on our own and I suspect the lack of interest in Artemis has less to do with Elon blowing rockets up, sending a car into space, and using it as another portal for him to be the biggest fucking government welfare grifter of all time… and more to do with the fact that a lot of us are stressed, starving, and/or worried about the near future.

      The fuck does slingshotting around the moon do right now to help us? Does it bring pedophiles to justice? Does it give us hope? Nope. I was jealous that they got to leave this God forsaken burning bullshit planet for a few days.

      Nothing good is happening at the moment. The bread is stale. We’ve all seen the circus shows.

      I’m tired. I’m angry. I don’t give a fuck about space.

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      After the 100th launch to put more junk in orbit, it not only gets boring but it’s also annoying knowing how much crap is being put into the sky.

      I’d guess after the 50th or so launch to the moon that people would be less interested as well.

  • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Honestly, I didn’t know Artimus was happening. That’s how busy the news is. I saw memes about astronauts and Outlook, assumed it was the ISS, and only when I saw the pictures of the Earth from the moon was I like “Wait, what? We have humans going to the moon right now? And they’re already there? When did that happen?”

    They’re living out their dreams, and doing something very rare for our species, and I wouldn’t recognize them if they were in line in front of me at the grocery store. Huh.

    • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think it’s *Artemis. And II, specifically. This mission was the farthest any known human has been from Earth. They’re doing several more in the Artemis line, including putting boots on the moon (2029, I think)

      The space race is back.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    13 hours ago
    1. Plenty of people were interested in Spacex flights. People did sour after he stopped looking like iron man and started being lex luthor by opening his mouth more
    2. Artemis is still not as impressive/envelope pushing to joe sixpack, since it’s “just” flying around the moon again. By this time, we are expecting moon bases or other advances of technology, since you know, actually LANDING on the moon started in the late 60s. It’s been 60 years.
    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Even to the space crowd, SLS doesn’t really introduce anything new.

      But when the Falcon 9 landed, and then the heavy’s dual landing. That was hype.

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I forgot that yeah, part of the hype was the re-useable rockets and their landing, which wasn’t going new places, but was doing something new.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I feel there was less excitement about the Artemis launch than early Space X launches. And it’s hard to stay excited when things become routine.

  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    somehow, I’m completely indifferent.

    I love science, and space, put in 1000s hours in Kerbal Space Program. followed space news though all my life. but now? with all that’s going on. A genocide perpetrated by a country claiming it’s for me, the US has become a fascist hell hole, rights are eroding so fast… I genuinely don’t care about this anymore.

    if it was a few years ago I would me following with exhalted breath. I would have taken time off work, and taken the kids off school to follow it, and play KSP emulating the mission. and watch space movies. and YouTube videos about the mission and spaceship… I was a massive space nerd.

    Can’t care about one rocket on the moon when we are sending thousands of rollers to kill civilians

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I feel this so much. I followed every NASA mission starting around 1965, with Gemini. I got a subscription to National Geographic because they had the best space pictures. I was an Apollo 11 fanboy, and cut articles out of the newspaper and put them in a scrapbook. I had models of the Saturn V and the Lunar Module. I was a hard core space kid.

      But now it feels so empty. The entire world is a mess, and it’s probably going to get a LOT worse before it gets better, and I just don’t feel like cheering for my country anymore. I love the Olympics, but I couldn’t get into it this year. This was basically Apollo 8, with more complex computers (that didn’t work), and 1000x the budget. It’s hard to get excited about re-inventing the wheel, especially when everything else is so bad.

      The wealthy (and the MAGA government is just an extension of the wealthy) would rather throw their money away on rockets, than spend an extra dime on taxes or higher wages. If not rockets, than AI, or some other cockamamie expensive solution in search of a non-existent problem. I just can’t stop thinking about what a waste of money all of this is, when America is such a shithole country.

  • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It also helps that this one didn’t explode immediately due to lazy fast-fail engineering, scattering billions of tax dollars across the landscape while a bunch of drunken tech dude-bros cheer.

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Probably would’ve been cheaper, faster, and better engineered if they did though. The reason NASA doesn’t do it is PR.

      • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        NASA funding is dependent on public opinion (well it was until recently). Blowing up rockets gets people really upset when they think it’s their tax dollars.

        Somehow SpaceX has convinced people it’s a private company and not funded by government contracts and taxes.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Blowing up rockets gets people really upset when they think it’s their tax dollars.

          I love spaceflight and what the Artemis II accomplished, but it came with an absolutely staggering price tag. It cost a bit more than $50 Billion to design including both the rocket and the Orion capsule. It costs $1Billion each time it launches too. We only bought enough parts for 4 flights of the rocket, and we’ve now used 2 of those.

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because it’s not…? They get the contracts because they’re the cheapest option, and these days they make more money through Starlink anyways.

          And who else should CRS have gone to? Lockheed Martin and Boeing?

      • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        no, I’m pointing it that it’s not one, it’s just the name of the person who said the thing

        • beep@piefed.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          43
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Then that make your original comment pointless, as you are calling on me to crop something that you said it’s an ad, while you know it isn’t.

            • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Huh?!

              not gonna crop out that username? isn’t that an ad for Betty Bowers?

              You’re literally the one calling names adverts, were the first to bring it up, and the other person didn’t say anything on the topic except in response to you.

              Are you confusing OP with someone else?

              • lividweasel@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                35
                ·
                13 hours ago

                beep has become notorious over in !comicstrips@lemmy.world for sleazily cropping out artist attributions, stating that they consider them to be “ads”. It led to so much uproar that a new mod came in and the community rules were overhauled.

                • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  beep even uses AI to substantially alter artists’ comics, including dialogue and artistic details. It’s as if he’s sitting there saying “hey slopbot, remove the artist details” and posting whatever he gets back.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I mean one (if I’m remembering correctly) went further into space than any human has been thus far, the other is an interesting technical step to normalising space flight.

    It’d be very weird if people were equally excited about both.

  • lividweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    SpaceX IS Artemis. At least a part of it. They were the first selected to provide the Human Landing System (the lunar lander). When the time comes for one of those to land humans on the moon, people will be excited. We just aren’t there yet.

    • Mitchie151@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Probably because they went around the moon which is perceived as not for profit endeavour to further humanity, unlike SpaceX polluting space with its outrageous satellites. I’m aware that SLS is just a jobs programme, but despite that the whole premise of Artemis is a little more visionary.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        15 hours ago

        No love to Elon but… SpaceX’s primary business and goal has nothing to do with starlink, which is just a fundraising venture.

        The goal has always been mars, with Starship and the superheavy launcher.

        If they just wanted to put up starlink, the falcon 9 system is more than capable, hence why it is the most flown space launch platform in human history, by quite a large margin.

        Also Musk is to SpaceX as Henry Ford is to the modern Ford motor corporation. He’s locked out of pretty much all decisions, he’s been locked out of the engineering decisions for years, and besides him buying and then reselling access like he did in ukraine he’s not really involved.

        I know Artemis has attracted people that haven’t paid attention to space flight since the 1960s, but there’s a reason the ISS is only going to use spacex capsules on the international side until it’s decommissioned; and there’s a reason why any on-moon missions are going to be pretty much just spaceX’s vehicles; at least according to all NASA plans for the next decade.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          SpaceX as Henry Ford is to the modern Ford motor corporation

          A nazi with political connections who keeps dropping completely unworkable tasks onto competent engineers and administrators, and also lost the company a shitton of money because he couldn’t stop disseminating nazi propaganda?

          • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Henry ford the dead person is not doing any of that, and Elon hasn’t done that for spacex since before he came out as a nazi.

            Please keep up with the world if you’re going to criticize it.

        • lividweasel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted. I assume it’s just because you aren’t saying “Elon bad”. What you said is accurate with the exception of the last part, because Blue Origin is also in the HLS (lunar lander) business now and there’s a decent chance theirs is ready first.

          Despite the stink of Elon on SpaceX, I bet many of these same people will closely follow a Starship HLS lunar landing. It’ll still be cool.

          • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Basically fake space fans that don’t know enough about the situation. They think hating Elon takes precedent over… literally all thought and facts; or that the billionaires behind the SLS and orion capsule are somehow better than the billionaire behind starship.

            Also classic reddit group think from people that have never been banned on reddit and just joined lemmy to be different.

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      artemis (boeing)

      Just for the clarity of the record:

      • the 1st stage tank of the SLS rocket is Boeing
      • the 2nd stage is ULA (a joint Boeing/Lockheed company)
      • the 1st and 2nd stage engines are Aerojet Rockdyne (which is now a subsidiary of L3Harris Technologies)
      • the solid rocket boosters on the side are Northrop Grumman
      • the service module is Airbus Defense and Space along with Thales
      • the capsule is Lockheed

      So you’ve got four giant American defense contractors, and two European defense contractors owned by French, German, Spain, and Italy.

      Maybe the communal part is the community of western defense contractors.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The question is why do you think spacex is an equal or greater communal effort.

      Comparing accomplishments is the outcome, not the effort, therefore not the communal effort.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        SpaceX, owned by nazi billionaire(s) but staffed by mostly ex-JPL engineers and people enthusiastic about getting humans to colonize space, works with NASA and multiple universities in order to advance the common goal of colonizing space;

        isn’t much different from:

        Boeing, Lockheed, and a half dozen defense contractors, all owned by nazi billionaires, all staffed with various engineers that have floated between public and private sector life, all working (in this exact instance) on the human colonization of space, all lead by NASA and the international science community.

        If we’re comparing accomplishments, then SpaceX has done more successful launches than the entirety of NASA, by a large margin; including human space flights.