Thanks. I didn’t get it

so Intel’s CEO is a clueless business bro. too bad

Agreed

Believe it or not, MSFT made one of those back in the 90s. Terrible keys, but it may be what you wanted.

Edit: they apparently still do: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/d/surface-ergonomic-keyboard/90pnc9ljwpx9?activetab=pivot%3Aoverviewtab

Corollary: if you have the capability to complete the requirements in a short period you should be allowed to.

I can’t imagine that it survives a court challenge, though.

I’m fairly certain that this is still a small number of people. Those who practice the Gospel of Prosperity will not be moved.

I don’t think precedent applies here. And if you want a historical analog, consider the New Deal.

They were also not progressive.

That would never have happened because the typical Democrat would have gotten in the way. It’s good to dream big but be realistic.

How did that work out last time? As long as there is an electoral college then you can’t hold people accountable.

I guess on my computer I would never notice it. Hmmm. Well sorry then.

Can we stop posting paywalled articles?

You know nothing. Just stop.

It’s clearer as time goes on that you have no experience with public sector funding. You’re just being contrary for its own sake.

You’re assuming that public hospitals are well enough funded to use discretionary funding in this way. Even the best health systems do not carry a surplus.

Where did you get in my statement that I dislike suicide prevention?

This means that someone jumped, the family sued, and your local nonprofit hospital had to spend money it didn’t have.

When people marched in NYC after Stonewall, it was the whole community: LGBTQ. Once the police let off, all of the LGB types abandoned the rest of the community and went back to their well-paying jobs. This author is just like one of these unempathetic sorts.

I think that by nature you can’t really have a libertarian leader. Everyone is doing their own thing