?
It doesn’t work any different when using a single system.
Edit: I’m not referring to the old sustem where you’d authorize a system to play your games on other users.
I’m referring to the way you have to log in when switching to a new user.
Eskating cyclist, gamer and enjoyer of anime. Probably an artist. Also I code sometimes, pretty much just to mod titanfall 2 tho.
Introverted, yet I enjoy discussion to a fault.
?
It doesn’t work any different when using a single system.
Edit: I’m not referring to the old sustem where you’d authorize a system to play your games on other users.
I’m referring to the way you have to log in when switching to a new user.
You can have multiple accounts on a single deck. The switch is pretty quick, but you do need to auth in some way unless you set it to not require it. You do not need to install the same game multiple times. Essentially, if you’ve ever used the desktop client with multiple accounts, the functionality is very similar.


Of course.
Lots of cybercrime has been solved by law-enforcement by matching traffic logs based on timestamps and throughput.


Nextclouds shortcomings can be addressed. I have no idea how you’d even begin to get collabora to work sanely.


That’s not what I’m saying at all. I’m saying Collaboras implementation is fundamentally unfit for use.
I used to host a CODE server.
It ran like shit, because it works by rendering the viewport on the remote system, not the client. Instead you essentially send every input to the server, wait for it to render the change, and then send that back to the client. Collabora is like using office software through vnc. Except all the time.
The responsiveness is atrocious. Especially if you try to use it over a less than ideal connection.
But it’s just fucking text data. It shouldn’t require the same infrastructure as remote gaming to be usable. It should be able to handle multiple seconds of latency, and just sync back up without the user ever noticing.
But it can’t. Because it RENDERS on the server. Which means the tiniest hiccup in the connection between server and user causes noticable issues.


How dpes that help me add office suite functionality to my nextcloud instance?


Collabora will never be good.
When I learned it’s “just” a libreoffice fork running on a remote server that is then screenshared to your browser…
The input latency and the graphical wierdness when resizing the viewport suddenly made sense.
I still want something better than onlyoffice for my nextcloud instance, but at least it is responsive.


I use matrix.
I run an instance for myself an immediate family. I also federate with other instances to participate in some dev groups.
The most active matrix space I’m in, is the one hosted by ani.social. Daily activity on anime-related topics, and also fediverse, lemmy and software.
If you want to try it, the main “matrix.org” instance is far from easy to recommend though. Finding good public matrix instances is a challenge. As such the best way is probably to either host one yourself or know someone who does.
They are out there, though. I’ve seen people be happy with pikaviestin.fi, but that’s only for finnish people. Mozilla also has an instance, though I’ve no experience on it.
Can’t beat arousal + cuteness aggression.


…
Wait it came out?
Edit: no, they’re rebooting it before even releasing it 🤣


Sea shanties intensify
Jukage.
Remember, the title depends on the village.


Double?
Man, if I got half the current value back on warranty…
Also food delivery.
In Finland, there used to be “pizza-online” which was really just a directory and ordering system for restaurants that already did delivery themselves.
They took a very small comission, as the site didn’t really do anything except connect restaurant and customer (and provide a review platform). For a long time, they didn’t even have an app.
You’d log in, select a restaurant, browse their menu and place an order. The order goes to the restaurant, and after that the site’s job was done.
It was massively succesful. Every hole in-the-wall pizza place was on there. Finding good food was easy and cheap, and the restaurants reached more customers than ever. And the platform including reviews led to competition in not just price, but quality.
Then pizza-online sold to foodora, and they got shut down, and participating restaurant were no longer allowed to deliver themselves, and the cut taken by the platform skyrocketed.


I mean, presumably this is all device-side on the stick.
It mounts the two partitions separately, and presents them separately. It doesn’t need to pass through the actual SD card to the host system at all.
If you dd the decoy partition you only ever see the decoy partition. Because the decoy partition is presented as a complete device, not just a partition, to the host system.
Why would this be incompatible with linux? If this is done the way it seems it is done, it’s not a filesystem trick.
It’s two partitions on one SD card being presented as two separate devices by the microcontroller that has actual direct access.
The real vulnerability would be that you could just crack it open to find the SD card.


Great news! We’ve the created the Torment Nexus, from the hit sci-fi series “Don’t Create the Torment Nexus”!


There are two PINs, PIN1 for ZKP and PIN2 for digital signing. The card does nothing without one.
Most EU countries provide some way for citizens to sign documents using a private key tied to their legal personage.
Putting it on the ID card they are given anyway just makes sense.
My final paragraph is there to explain that a lot of “digital signatures” aren’t really signatures in any meaningful way. What goes into the actual file doesn’t matter at all, UNLESS it’s the aforementioned cryptographic signature.


When a website has you type a name as a signature it’s a legal representation of that signature. There’s nothing cryptographic at all about it. Wjere would you even store the key? I’ve made ways to use Webauthn keys to do this, but no signatory uses these methods.
I claimed no such thing. That is not a digital signature.
I’m fairly certain we are not discussing the same thing.
I can digitally sign documents the way I have described, NOT IN A WEB BROWSER, using entirely local or even open source software, using my government issued ID card.
The solution provided for electronic signatures by the Digital and Population Data Services Agency is a signature certificate. The certificate is located in the card chip.
As described by the relevant finnish agency, this is enabled by a “signature certificate” stored on peoples ID cards. The functionality uses a separate PIN from that which you use to verify your identity in the context of a website you are visiting.
I am not aware of any other way for me to sign a document in such a way. All the other signatures, which do also work, are something else. And potentially insecure in all the ways OP thinks. (Someone else can type the same name).
In Overlord, there’s also the one guy that just flies around in a sci-fi mecha suit.
In a fantasy world.