I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.
Cue the circus music 🤡🎪
EDIT: cue not queue.
/petpeeve
Thank you, I learned something new today.
Could be either, if there was other music playing first…
deleted by creator
Standard fart operating procedure
A salesman for an AI consulting company made the comment that we don’t expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI? He was smug about it, too, like it was his big gotcha. Joke’s on him, I’m the one that talked the bosses out of spending money with them.
“Is your AI accountable for mistakes? All these idiots are…”
That’s such a bad argument too. The whole point of technology is to help perfect the output of humans. Why would we buy technology that is known to not do that
“You can get pretty good results most of the time and save money on labor!” Not like our whole business model is focused on expertise and compliance or anything. Surely our clients won’t mind a few little mistakes here and there, as a treat.
The neat part is that we can’t even claim that they’re little mistakes or that there’s few of them.
we don’t expect perfection from humans, so why should we expect it from AI?
If we can’t expect better from an AI than from a human, why should we use the AI (other than so you don’t have to pay workers)?
I think there’s an important semantic difference between worse performance and correctness. Tools, like AI, can underperform when compared to humans and still be very useful and worth investing into, but that’s only as long as they perform correctly.
Tools, like AI, can underperform when compared to humans and still be very useful and worth investing into, but that’s only as long as they perform correctly.
Yeah, the ‘but’ is the entire problem. In my experience, LLM chatbots are like if you made a 12yo a junior admin and fed them speed. Very quick to give you a confident answer, but wrong more often than not. The worst part is a lot of what I’m doing is coding, and it gets basic commands and syntax wrong
Like there’s a big shortage of unemployed humans
Unless you plan on enslaving them, please refer to my previous comment RE: paying humans.
RE?
Is it Weskin time yet? That would certainly solve unemployment.
If it works, it’s thanks to us. If it doesn’t, it’s your fault.
Ah, the famous “Fox News” defense of claiming you’re an entertainment medium but you should totally trust it.
for entertainment purposes only, not serious use — firm pushing AI hard
Reminds me of these Autopiloting cars LOL
They, do it all by themselves, fully and autonomously and are pushed so hard as well, but you may not rely on them, never take them for serious.
and didn’t tusla recently discontinue the whole thing
For entertainment in Excel…
There are some real sickos out there man
Just like Fox news
That was my first thought, they’re using the Fox News legal defense
What regulatory capture of the FTC does to MFer.
All this shit should be considered false advertising, at the very least.
Then why are they promoting it, in a pizza ad, as letting CoPilot handle the spreadsheets. Do they not trust their own product!?
its same mentality as drug supplier avoiding to get high on his own suppily.
They want your money, not your lawsuits.
My favorite part of that ad was that it was just “magic.”
He plugged in existing numbers and it generated some charts and there’s a line out the door!
Did AI renegotiate supplier agreements? Did it find a way to advertise in a new way? Ha, ha! Who’s to say, just use it why don’t cha??
Are you not entertained?!
Yes, that’s why it’s in Office
If joke, why required shaped?
deleted by creator
