• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There will always be people who are the smartest and/or shrewdest and/or most ambitious and/or luckiest, in a population. “Just get rid of the people who currently have the most wealth” is extraordinarily naive.

    • Little_mouse@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s kind of a difference between “whoever happens to be wealthiest at the moment” and “The 0.001% of the population that is three times wealthier than the bottom 50% of humanity combined.”

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Over the long term, there really isn’t. Outside of a government imposing tyranny-tier control over everyone’s wealth, wealth inequality happens naturally, and inevitably, and the gap widens similarly.

        What’s more important is making sure that even the poorest among us can have a decent standard of living. After all, if you waved a magic wand and now everyone in the US, for example, was earning $75,000 a year minimum, no one would be in poverty, right? And yet the size of the ‘wealth gap’ between the wealthiest and the $75k ‘minimum earners’ would effectively be identical; the gap between $0 and billions is basically the same as the gap between $75k and billions.

        Toppling the wealthiest just because they’re the wealthiest isn’t going to solve any of the actual problems (especially when politicians get bribed for relatively-measly five figure sums, etc.).

          • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            you get everyone a baseline income of $75k is by taking it from the billionaires

            Actually, no. That’s a hypothetical for a reason; the entire net worth of all billionaires combined (assuming a magic wand could convert the net worth figure into an equivalent amount of cash, literally impossible in reality) wouldn’t get everyone to $75k for even a single year.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fallout S1 reveals what would really happen.

      Tap for spoiler

      Incontent with their underground paradise, they go out and obliterate all forms of civilization that aren’t them.

      • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Do the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy version then. Load them all into a ship, tell them we’ve discovered a habitable planet and we’re sending our best and brightest to start a new civilization, and fire them into space.

        Pretty sure you could at least get rid of Elon that way.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hitchhiker’s Guide kinda did the opposite, the ark was filled with all the people doing the menial, boring and ‘unimportant’ jobs and the other 2 arks died out because they didn’t know how to get basic shit done… well actually it was an un-sanitized telephone but thats how I read the metaphor.