• entwine@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If antitrust was being enforced, Google execs wouldn’t even dream of attempting this bullshit.

    Antitrust regulation is probably the easiest way to fix the biggest problems in our society, it is 100% bipartisan, and it is easy to explain to the average US voter. The only group that is against it is the billionaires/ultra wealthy. Instead, politicians are all hyperfocused on culture war mudslinging and bullshit that makes no difference.

    Break up Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta (just to start), and watch how the tech industry explodes with innovation again, and the tech billionaire becomes an endangered species. The AI bubble will burst as companies actually need to compete to survive, and thus won’t be burning as much resources on crap that clearly doesn’t work.

  • gergo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    the win in this is that many people realise how locked google has made android and how blatantly and arbitrarily google exerts their control over it. hopefully that will be input to some consumer decision (when sailfish becomes an alternative) and a tiny bit more people will consider their choice when getting a new phone. and maybe it also helps some regulation to be agreed (in europe, obviously).

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Making users wait 24 hours doesn’t improve security; it’s an anti-competitive change designed to make the Google Play store seem like less of a hassle in comparison.

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can actually see where it can improve security against scammers trying to scam elderly and non-tech savvy people.

      • Scammer tries to get someone to install malware from their site
      • Victim isn’t familiar with sideloading, but scammer instructs them
      • Victim hits the first time 24 hour block and has to restart and wait
      • The restart alone breaks contact with the scammer, scam thwarted

      For the rest of us that know our way around Android, it’s just a one time annoyance, after completing all the steps to enable sideloading, you won’t have to wait 24 hours anymore.

  • RamRabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    No we didn’t win. This is Google making it harder to install the programs you want, rather than the programs Google wants you to have.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can someone please come out with a phone that’s an actual computer and help stop this nonsense?

    Phones cost a lot of money at this point and I’m completely sick of them being some locked down, surveillance ridden pile of crap. A reasonably built one would be able to replace a laptop at this point if it weren’t for these artificial constraints imposed by the stupid fucking suits running things.

    • TrippinMallard@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Battery life is limited by cell modem drivers being closed source and having to be reverse engineered.

      I have been looking into an alternate hybrid radio device using Reticulum. Though with that comes a new less convenient user experience for a lot of apps.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Intentionally non-standard hardware does not get a real custom rom. It’s just a mod of Android which Google can render intentionally incompatible any time they want

      • ranzispa@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        As long as your phone model is supported by any custom mod. I have checked compatibility for almost all smartphones I owned, some 7 or 8 through the years.

        Not a single one of them was ever supported by a custom mod.

        • kepix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          but you did not check custom rom aupport before you bought tgem, cause did not want freedom and moddability. its on you.

  • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I, as the owner of my device, don’t want to wait 24h.

    I hope this will popularize the ROM community again. It gradually faded out due to mainstream ROMs having every perk of the custom ROMs but now the custom ROMs can start offering freedom, which no official ROM will offer.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think the 24 hour wait is at least a sensible alternative. Anybody who’s going to be seriously installing apps on their devices like this is probably going to be using Lineage OS or Graphene OS or /e/OS or something like that anyway. And in that case, they will be using AOSP and not be subject to this because they’re not running a Google certified device.

    While I’m not particularly happy about this change, I think it could be way worse.

    Something tells me that Google drastically underestimated the amount of pushback they were going to get when they announced this. I mean, very drastically underestimated.

  • Rekall Incorporated@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Nah, American companies cannot be relied upon by definition. Even if the people running one are fine (and many are), they are still based in what is essentially a pro-crime, pro-corruption jurisdiction.

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not side loading. It’s installing software on the device you probably paid multiple thousands for that you no longer own.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the process doesn’t include any phone home stuff, and is just a one-time cool off period to prevent scammers, this is acceptable to me. That should be enough to get potential victims to self-question, ask more knowledgeable people of what’s going on to avoid being unknowingly hacked, without being naggy every time for users that want to do what they want.

    Making a software “foolproof” will probably invent a bigger better fool, hoping for some sort of free crypto app jumping through these hoops, but this should weed out most of the basic scams.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It still sets your phone in a state that marks it as security compromised. This could lead i.e. to banking apps not working. I’m not so sure about the “acceptable” state of things here.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t care if it’s android or anything else, the moment my phone does that is the moment I switch to something else.