Data gathered by Chartbeat and shared by Axios reveals that, over the past year, Google Search traffic to publishers across the broader web have fallen drastically, and proportionally more so for smaller websites. Referral traffic from Google apparently fell by 60% for “small publishers,” while “medium publishers” (those with between 10,000-100,000 daily pageviews) saw a drop of 47%. “Large publishers,” meanwhile, saw a 22% drop. That last category would be any site getting over 100,000 daily pageviews.

It’s not just Google Search either. While Search traffic dropped by 34%, traffic from Google Discover has also fallen by 15% over the past year, the report found.

  • Hond@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Most of the time i use search engines to get to wikipedia. Now i have to add “wiki” to most of my queries because wikipedia wont even show up on the first page.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      …why don’t you just go to Wikipedia to begin with? I’m honestly asking. URLs still exist.

      • Hond@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Wikipedias search kinda sucked 15 years ago. So i never bothered to try it again since then tbh

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          It seems significantly better now. A lot of topics, I just go straight to Wikipedia now.

        • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Why would I need any of that if I can bang the search bar of my browser instead, and it takes me straight to search on Wikipedia or any other site I want without waiting for DDG to add that site?

          • Komodo Rodeo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Relieved to find this response below the others. Why TF would you search for a site i) whose URL you know? ii) waste space on your browser by adding the website as a search bar on your browser’s menu bar? How much time do people anticipate they’ll save by avoiding typing Wikipedia.org into the address field?

            • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              That’s not what I mean. I have a keyword like ‘wik’ set to take me to Wikipedia’s search, and if I type ‘wik black pus’, i get the page for that term.

              I also have an extension that shows a popup with buttons for different search engines whenever I select text on a page, and I have a similar thing on the phone for text shared from any app. Each of these methods has about twenty-seven sites configured in it. Considering that I look up things on these sites easily a dozen times a day, it’s ridiculous to say that this doesn’t save me time over opening each site.

              (P.S.: This workflow also allows using the keyboard for keyword-triggered search, while the search interface on some sites is getting less accommodating and assumes me mousing around.)

            • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s not how any of this works. The browser has its own list of search engines. Seriously, look in the settings sometimes.

              Firefox even has two separate mechanisms for this, the second is via bookmarks with keywords.