• IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The government is a bunch of clowns. What gives them the right to tell him what he can or can’t do with his own personal device?

    • greyscaleA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      6 days ago

      What gives them the right

      The monopoly on violence.

    • cadekat@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      To be clear I don’t agree with this statement, but the steelman counterargument would be something like: if the president of the United States were to destroy evidence of a crime, shouldn’t that also be a crime?

  • GardenGeek@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    If this goes through it sets a precedent for the government declaring someone a criminal for being in a political organisation simply unfavorable to them. He couldn’t destroy evidence if he wasn’t a criminal could be the take-home-message between the lines they intend to propagate.

  • CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Story has already changed. Originally it was him giving border agents the kill code which they entered.