Article about an experiment from Brisbane, Australia.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    The point would be to remove/recover street parking for more important uses. Especially in older urban neighborhoods you might have really narrow streets, no room for bicycle or bus lanes. This lets you compromise: car is still possible for those who need it, but less convenient so used less, neighborhood streets have reduced traffic and can be opened for cycling or pedestrians

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, if the point is to remove street parking, I’m in favor of that.

      I don’t think there should be any real government intervention to then create additional parking, though. Seems like a move in the wrong direction.

      What I think would be good instead, though, is ending parking minimums and then declaring that businesses cannot restrict who parks in their lots to only customers. They can charge a fee for the use of their lot, but otherwise anyone can park there for any amount of time. This would vastly expand the amount of long term parking, drastically driving down the price, while also incentivizing landowners to now redevelop their parking lots into something useful