• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          You can’t see the difference between being forced to work and have sex with a single man, who you are stuck with without the possibility of divorce, and the general need to work for one of any number of employers? Really?

            • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Reducing dependency on employers doesn’t mean completely doing away with employment. Probably the most effective way would be establishing stronger worker protections so employers can’t exploit their employees so profoundly. If employee protections can be designed well enough, and enforced strongly enough that exploitation can be reduced to 0, fully rendering the means of production and their benefits to the worker.

              Essentially, we can’t dismantle patriarchy without dismantling the economic structures that prop it up. Turns out liberation movements like feminism and worker freedom dovetail with each other pretty well. After all, no one is free until everyone is free.