• leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    (in green) Went to Golden Corral for the first time with my dad and his wife yesterday. A nice hangout for kids. Saw a couple cute boys and a hot little girl (…)

    (…)

    (…all-)you-can-eat Boyffet.

        • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, I seriously don’t see how that comment could be considered incriminating. That would mean that no adult could ever talk to kids. Which shouldn’t need to be explained just how stupid that is.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Mentioning seeing a “hot little girl” who is also a “kid” isn’t incriminating? Maybe there’s nothing immediately legally-actionable about it, but Wheel of Fortune was absolutely right to give him the ol’ heave-ho over it. Best case (for them), it’s the grossest sentence ever written. Worst case, there’s about to be an investigation that will land him in jail for the rest of his life. Either way, firing him is a reasonable consequence for being odious.

            • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              “oh, maybe that person was just a random deviant and isn’t connected to the rest of the chat.” Then why didn’t anyone call him out? Why wasn’t he banned?

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Even in the incredibly unlikely scenario that was written by a child, why is this grown man participating in the conversation?

            Come on, have some common sense. It’s quite obvious what’s happening here. This is also not the only relevant piece of the transcript.