• KevinOnEarth@mstdn.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    @Quittenbrot @bearboiblake
    This is because of the nature of “Leadership”: It is impossible to become a “Leader” of a major nation (/corp/institution) with any tangible power without having done strings of deals (i.e. compromises, i.e. selling out popular interests for private/personal ones, i.e. corruption).
    The most successful “Leaders” are simply the most convincing liars.

    • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I agree.

      But wouldn’t you agree that this fundamental dilemma of power inviting abuse has been proven by humanity to be irrespective of the label of the respective societal system?

      • KevinOnEarth@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        @Quittenbrot
        Yes, they are irrespective of labels or systems or ideologies. There is a small % of humanity that are self-righteous, self-interested, double-dealing control freaks. The worst amongst them will always end up competing for power. The rest of us are essentially credulous, malleable serfs.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I absolutely would agree with that, and that is why I advocate for anarchism, which is the one and only ideology I have encountered which actually accounts for that fact.