• ChristerMLB@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I can see a situation where that makes sense. A colleague who keeps morale up can be at least as important for the team as one who works hard

    …on the other hand, it can also be a way for managers to reward their loyal favorites for no particular reason.

    I dunno, this makes me happy we have collectively bargained wages at my workplace

    • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      My take on it is that the manager should take her complaint seriously and should not have replied like that. That’s all we can really go on as we don’t know anything else about the situation, work load, what Marcus should be doing, etc.

    • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, the manager fucked up by providing too much info and wording it poorly. If it’s “you two have different skills and contribute to the team in different ways” that’s another story. If Marcus is also making sure the rest of the team feels supported and keeps morale high then that is work too! (As someone who often fills the emotional support human role, on top of regular duties, I’m glad that this could be recognized). Productivity is more than work output, and comparison is the thief of joy.

      If the person is upset because they feel their workload is too high, or that they aren’t being compensated for their own work, then that’s a different convo they should be having.