• WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Oh yea! Exactly! Thing I should just make that community, because I think that if I keep waiting for the perfect design, and free time, I will just accumulate bans, hatters, and chronic diseases instead.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Nothing” is definitely an interesting way to pronounce “many things”

    • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is there? There are hundreds of giant worker co ops here in brazil, and I know multiple people who live in amarchist communities in the wooxds. Most of them don’t last very long, but they do try, and then stop on theirbown accord.

      BTW, a giant worker co op named Aurora was responaible for slave like conditions in one of their many grape farms.

      • etherphon@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I can only really speak for the US it doesn’t seem to go over too well here, and uh, americans making a commune in south america doesn’t have a really good track record either lol

  • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    They teach that communism is evil where they should be teaching Soviet Union wasn’t communist, they were doing the same thing the US is doing now.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Nothing stopping you” except the government. “Which government?” Most of them.

  • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nothing is stopping you from forming communes all over the place

    The USSR, Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam famously forming unopposed. Capitalists and feudalists famously did not try to invade them and overturn their elections.

  • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I had an argument with a friend where he was like “capitalism is everywhere because it works!! How can you say communism is good when it doesn’t survive but capitalism does!” It’s like yeah bombing and invading other countries worked, that doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing we want to keep happening…

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Nothing is stopping you” - actually not true, you need government permission and they will just say no.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Every single attempt at establishing a communist society was fought tooth and nail every step of the way by capitalists. By any means necessary.

  • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    In Caliban and the Witch, Silvia Federici proposes that even before the 1500s as a process of primitive accumulation, proto capitalist used the witch purges in Europe to usher in the family structures required to begin capitalism, killing hundreds of thousands of women in the process.

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, it really depends on how you track it. Modern estimations place it from 40-60 thousand official executions. However that does not count lynchings, people who died in prison, or while being questioned or because of their torture afterwards.

    • henfredemars@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was explicitly taught as a child that communism was a self-destructive framework of ideas that threatens our future prosperity. For this reason we won’t be studying the ideology but instead study the harmful effects such as famines.

      And that’s as far as I understood it for more than a decade.

      • maria [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        we actually had an AFD member as our social studies teacher (AFD is one of the right-leaning parties in germany).

        and… yea, he was fin guy. but most importantly: he was open to talking about stuff.

        we had some genuine discussions about capitalism and communism and how things could work out. and… surprise surprise, we ended on the exact same values: capitalism is looking really shoddy rn, but if somehow everyone on earth would turn into a nice peep with altruistic values, high amounts of empathy and a drive ti genuinely make the world a better place and make people happy - capitalism may work well.

        im very sorry fir saying that. iguess… Germany’s social democracy dumbed me down to believing there could be a good world under capitalism - aaaawhoppsie- (sorry)

    • ogy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What an odd thing to say. Is that the bar you think we need to clear?

      • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It was an honest question. I’m looking for a good faith answer. What sets the British empire apart from those that came before or after it?

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Not too familiar with the roman systems, but here’s a relevant text from a wikipedia article on capitalism:

          The economic foundations of the feudal agricultural system began to shift substantially in 16th-century England as the manorial system had broken down and land began to become concentrated in the hands of fewer landlords with increasingly large estates. Instead of a serf-based system of labor, workers were increasingly employed as part of a broader and expanding money-based economy. The system put pressure on both landlords and tenants to increase the productivity of agriculture to make profit; the weakened coercive power of the aristocracy to extract peasant surpluses encouraged them to try better methods, and the tenants also had incentive to improve their methods in order to flourish in a competitive labor market. Terms of rent for land were becoming subject to economic market forces rather than to the previous stagnant system of custom and feudal obligation.