• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    There are 3 steps in the meme. “Nauseated and having not eaten.” “Eating.” “And nauseated after having eaten.” So this person is clearly nauseated for reason beyond hunger or having eaten, unless their nausea before was cause from hunger and the nausea after was caused by eating spoiled food.

    Also hunger does not cause me nausea, so… no can’t say I relate directly. It can for my wife though, so I have dealt with that situation. But if she was nauseated, ate something, and then was still nauseated, then clearly it wasnt the hunger causing her nausea. It was something else, like a flu, meds, or digestive issues.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      You’re not getting it because your body doesn’t do this. That’s ok. Your wife probably does then.

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        I don’t see what there is to “get”. I understand what you are saying. I’m saying that you are projecting meaning onto the meme that isn’t there, or are trying to conflate it with some other meaning. The point still stands, regardless of how your body reacts to hunger, that if your nausea is persistent regardless of whether or not you have eaten recently, then your issue isnt simply related to whether you have eaten, is it? There is nothing to get beyond that.

        • dingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          You’re the one clearly projecting your own meaning onto the meme because it is something you do not relate to and cannot experience…