fuck offffff

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Im a perfect world, as they claim, its a secondary system listening that isn’t recording or transmitting anything, and is meant to be low power. If it hears the wake up word, it wakes up the other mic and starts recording.

    Thats how they claim the smart speakers work anyway.

    This would be different.

      • neclimdul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I have a memory of people black boxing it and seeing power usage and network traffic that supported the claims but that was a snapshot in time and as others note its all proprietary.

        It takes a lifetime to build a good reputation, but you can lose it in a minute.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They ship with proprietary code, this would be the point of open source.

        In practice in my experience, every company is at least skirting the law regarding privacy, and I never worked for one big enough that could lobby itself out of a fine.

          • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I used to run forensic network capture and analysis tools.

            First thing, traffic is encrypted. All you will see is a blob of traffic passing through. You used to see hostnames with TLS, but now with quic, you see nothing. This makes it hard.

            You could root the phone and install a root ca certificate for a decrypting proxy, you might see more, but the data itself (not just the transport protocol) could be encoded or even encrypted within the network encapsulation.

            Next, you’d have to reverse engineer the protocol if they’re using something nonstandard. Also, malware can often be set up to “behave” when it can detect analysis. I’m all but certain Google would do this.

            Maybe you could do statistical analysis of the traffic and attempt to baseline normal vs when it’s transmitting audio. It would be a bit of a blind guess at best.

            If I had more time, I’d love to try it. I have an old pixel7 pro. Maybe I can sort something out.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            If its real time monitoring you, but not if its logging data to send later when it would be expected to be doing so.

            Audio doesnt take up much space.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Even if it was open source, you’d need to be able to verify what they ship matches the specs. Allowing you to flash whatever you want onto it helps, but you still need to validate the hardware.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I dont know. You’d need to reverse engineer the hardware and software to be confident, and could a OTA update then sneak a bypass in anyway?

        Edit: i think Amazon might have abandoned this as well and always records on echos now too.