• Zatore@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    You sound like a spiteful person. Remind me not to serve with you

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I mean, given the current task force directive is “Murder innocent people to distract the world from our leader’s pedophilia”, I do express some disappointment in any active duty members that don’t refuse orders.

      • Zatore@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Refusing orders is a real fast way to prison or execution. I get your point, but the military is setup to make challenging orders as risky as possible.

          • Zatore@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The US government. If a member of the military disobeys a direct order they get court marshaled. The rules there are different than the typical US court system and way more harsh in a lot of cases.

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              The US government is not a person. It’s a lot of people who individually choose to follow the rules. One of those rules is: Congress decides wars. You might have missed the point behind my question.

              If there is one thing anyone should have learned about 2025, it’s that in the United States, there are never any real consequences for breaking the rules. Each of us decides which ones are real and which to follow.