• schema@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I always have to laugh when someone argues that CEOs should make million and billions because “they have all the risk”. What risk? As CEO, you can virtually ram a billion dollar company into the ground, and the worst that will happen to you is a multimillion dollar severance package.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Best I can do is replaced by an executive assistant who flips a coin for every major decision.

          We might have an opening in product or maybe QA if they’re ok sitting on 3 scrums.

    • smeenz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That would only motivate them to outsource their low level staff to contractors so they could avoid including those people for the purposes of the calculation

      • Folstar@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        If only we could forsee these types of things and plan the rules accordingly. Regardless, even this system would be an improvement. When MegaCorp becomes 20 dudes in an office who outsource everything, they’ll have to sign deals. The more they squeeze, the lower the pay for JanitorCorp’s CEO (for example), who will push back because their workers getting bent over a barrel harms them. The janitors would actually have someone looking out for them. It’d be a sort of Frankenstein’s monster of quasi-unions. Far from ideal, but again, better than now.