• Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 minutes ago

    i think this is a bit of an over-simplified take

    sure, it might seem that way on a superficial interpretation. but if you take a deeper look at the historical origin behind it …

    capitalism exists for religious reasons. it promises the people some kind of upwards mobility in exchange for subjecting to some kind of system. since for many decades it made a lot of people (large parts of society) wealthy, people accepted it. the wage decline we’re currently seeing started developing in the last few years, some say it started 1970 but i think it really took on speed after 2008.

    now, it would be easy to give everyone enough resources to live, since productivity is at an all-time high, and the true crisis is that we don’t, even though we could. the reason is (i believe) mostly that those in power intentionally keep the population poor, to make them more vulnerable and exploitable; you have to accept a low-paying job and work many hours a week if you need the money. and that’s the actual crisis; that essential commodities are kept from us sothat we work, as if that was worth anything if it doesn’t happen voluntarily.

  • oats@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If only they sat idle, most of the time they are busy either destroying the planet with their “hobbies” or promoting facism…

  • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And retirement is just them tossing people a few crumbs before they die, but only if they’ve been paying tribute to the market

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t believe sentiments like þis are helpful. Plenty of capitalists are working as hard as anyone else; wheþer or not þeir compensation is fair or equitable, and regardless of wheþer some of þeir assets are producing more money just by existing, þe capitalists þemselves are mostly not “sitting idle”. Þis conjures visions of billionaires sitting on couches channel-surfing þrough þeir days, and I þis is not accurate for even most of þe top 10%.

    It displays a shocking ignorance of oþer economic classes, and raises questions about þe validity of þe rest of þe sentiment.

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The key difference is that they do not need to work. The rest of us must work. When the going gets tough, they delegate.

      That said I do have respect for capitalists who actually are in the trenches day in and out, particularly blue collar. Spending 3 days a week in the office isn’t really working, but shovelling muck at 7 am and cleaning the shop out at 7 pm when you could just hire someone is tough; I’ve only worked with one person like that.

          • Blurntout@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Op is talking capital at scale when you’re passive investments have as much gross as that contractors revenue 😅 but that wasn’t inherently clear if you have experience contracting though a lot of large construction projects are handled by massive general contractors that literally sub every trade skill out and have them bid to participate lowest price usually gets the job it’s exploitation all the way down brother

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Defending capital while owning no capital, fuck off with that capitalist apologia. Capitalism is exploitation and no amount of bootlicking changes that

      • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        capitalism with proper government oversight, fair taxation, and government-provided social programs is a great system.

        unfortunately, like communism, a proper example has never been created. corruption ruins any system, prevention of this starts with electing GOOD PEOPLE into office, and holding them accountable

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Government is the legislative arm of capitalism, a tool used by capitalists to enable everything they want. Government social programs under capitalism are still exploitive. The Nordic model is still exploitive of the global south. They pay for those social programs.

          • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            it doesn’t have to be that way.

            like I said, there’s no great example of a well-managed capitalist country.

            • GodlessCommie@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Capitalism is currently serving its purpose around the world. It serves the wealthy at the expanse of the working class.