• TurboQueer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Locks keep honest people honest and that’s it. Also, a lot of anecdotes here. If you want into most luggage, not all, you just push a ballpoint pen into the teeth of the zipper. You’re stronger and smarter than any box, and don’t let them tell you otherwise.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Three digit combination locks are not that secure in general. Assuming one second per attempt, it takes at most 17 minutes to brute force. 000 would definitely be the first combination most any brute force attacker would try though.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Whwn i was a child, for some reason i was responsible for all our luggage passwords. I don’t know why it happened or who thought that was a good idea. Anyway, i somwtimes forgot one after a year of not using one of four luggages or someone maybe changed it by accident. I brute forced so many of them, it’s shockingly easy. Especially if you gamble and start with 555 or whatever. One time it took me forever, because i just assimes it wasn’t 000 and started with 001

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Luggage aplenty in the airport, just have to make yours more trouble to get into. Which is why I put a keyring through both zippers rather than a lock.

    My bigger concern is being able to identify my luggage at a glance, so I paint all of the edges on mine neon yellow.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    22 hours ago

    One time I was in the car with a friend who had just gotten a new piece of luggage. He was fiddling with it and told me that he had set a new code on it. I asked “Is it XXX” (some random 3 digit number I made up but forgot). It was Somehow, I got the 1 in 1000 chance and really did guess his luggage code first try

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We once had a band room and we used 2 different combinations to get in the building and then room. I still remember my friend going: the first one is BLINK 182 and then we walked to the second one and he was like: this one is 667, because it’s the neighbour of the devil. That was like 18 years ago.

      Last year i went to do an escape room, with people completely unrelated to the band and that friend group. There were two combination locks, and instead of solving puzzles, i was like: this one is 182 because BLINK 182 and it opened. The second one i said: this has to be 667, because it’s the neighbour of the devil. And it opened. “Solved” the whole thing in 20 seconds, and i still refuse to elaborate. I mean there isn’t much to elaborate, but they don’t know that

  • blackbrook@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you don’t because you think you have nothing worth stealing, consider that some joker can open your bag and set your combination to something else.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t have any luggage or bags that use locks like that.

    There is no point.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      There is a point: make your bag slightly less attractive to steal from. You don’t have to outrun the bear, you just have to outrun someone else.

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Oh, you’re telling the little outrun the bear story… But you didn’t cover the part about putting on the tennis shoes.

        What you have to learn is which bear to outrun. You have to do a proper risk assessment.

        All your useless little lock does is tell thieves that there might be something of value to steal in your luggage so they’ll target yours.

        I think my running shoes are faster than yours now

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        WTF are they going to steal? your underwear?

        Anyone stealing luggage won’t give a shit about some POS tumbler lock…

        The risk with your luggage is that its get lost.

        • deranger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          You said there’s no point. I contend there is a point.

          The point is to make it slightly less convenient to steal from. This is the purpose of literally all locks. There are no locks that can’t be picked or bypassed. I don’t care if it’s my underwear, pants, shirts, shoes, whatever. They’re mine and I packed them because I want to use them. I’d prefer they’re not stolen, and some of my clothes are valuable, or at least I don’t want to spend the money to replace them.

          Maybe someone’s just having a shit day and wants to fuck with luggage to be obnoxious. I’d rather it not be mine, and a lock makes my bag slightly more annoying to fuck with.

          Agreed that a lost bag is much more likely than theft. I have an AirTag in my bag to help with that scenario.

      • oats@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        My luggage leaves my direct sight exactly zero times. Gonna be akward to steal from it…

    • mystrawberrymind@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah I agree. I don’t keep anything valuable in my luggage because I don’t need the risk when checked. I could lose my luggage and it would just be boo hoo. A bunch of clothes lol sucks but not the end of the world.

      I just have a lockable zipper on my personal item. That’s been enough all these years, plus common sense. xD