• JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I imagine that’s due to a combination of dissent against the war or insufficient support for it? And then, is the implication that their holdings were usually scooped up by the state?

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If not the state itself then the state owned companies that they controlled, or one of Putin’s allies.

      But yeah, the podcast is worth a listen.