• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      If it makes you feel better, most gun owners own many guns, so there isn’t actually a gun in everyone’s hands.

      Just a lot of them in a few hands… Much better…

      • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some people are collectors, but a lot of people just have some old guns around.

        Also if guns are a hobby or interest of yours, you are likely to own several. Just like people who are into headphones, mechanical keyboards, vintage gaming consoles, bicycles, etc.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I was about to compare it to telescopes. Most people don’t have one, most people who have one only have one, but a few of us have upwards of five

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Just like people who are into sarin, questionably stored viral samples, bombs, gillotines, etc.

          You can call these things “collectables” but their nature doesn’t change because you put a friendly term to it. It is psychologically fucked up to stockpile lethal weapons that can only be used for taking life without even having a practical application in mind.

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I’m going to push back a little bit. For one thing, have you ever gone hunting? Some would say that taking life (specifically deers and rabbits and stuff) is a practical application. For two, sport shooting is a thing. Being good at using a weapon can be rewarding in and of itself, whether you’re talking about guns, bows, slingshots, or throwing knives.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Most gun owners have more than one. If you’re a hunter, you might want to shoot different rounds for different game or seasons.

      My state bans the use of rifles for deer hunting in most circumstances. In that example, you’d want 12ga for deer hunting, 20ga for duck, and 5.56 would be used for coyotes, boar, or groundhogs. And if you go boar hunting you’ll want a sidearm (9mm or .45) because they’ll gore you if they get the chance.

      So that totals 4 guns for a single person with decent reasoning. Plus, if you had kids and took them hunting, you’d want at least 1 more of each type.

      And for people who live in non-rural areas, you might decide to concealed carry a 9mm for protection. But handguns aren’t as ideal for home defense, so you might want a shotgun or 9mm carbine for that task, so that’d be 2 guns for 1 person.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        My jaw figuratively dropped when you suggested putting rifles and side arms in the hands of kids.

        Gotta have an age limit on those things.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m saying to hand rifles to toddlers, nor that the kids get unrestricted access to the guns. JFC it’s like you’re deliberately trying to misunderstand.

          Where I live it’s normal for teens to go hunting alongside there parents, and when the guns aren’t in use they are stored in the family gun safe that only the parents can get into.

          These parents also teach their kids gun safety, and with exposure the kids know that the guns aren’t toys to be played with. This shares similarities to how many European countries’ drinking age of 16 removes the novelty and rebellion of drinking, generally preventing them from drinking to excess

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I understood what you meant. No misunderstanding there. I do not think teens under 18 should be handling a lethal weapon. Matter fact it should be over 21. My opinion. 🤷‍♂️