IndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Crazy Fucking Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days ago[Video] British journalist Steve Sweeney bombed by Israel while reporting in Lebanoni.imgur.comvideomessage-square200linkfedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up181arrow-down1video[Video] British journalist Steve Sweeney bombed by Israel while reporting in Lebanoni.imgur.comIndustryStandard@lemmy.world to Crazy Fucking Videos@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square200linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoI only get my news from trusted CIA cutouts owned by billionaire oligarchs
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoIt’s possible to dislike propaganda irrespective of who is dishing it out.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoWhat news source, pray tell, is not propaganda?
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoThere are many that don’t exist exclusively to push the narrative their owners want to get out there, don’t be so obtuse.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoThat claim is ridiculous. Name a single media source that does not slavishly serve the political context it arises from
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoAP, Reuters, BBC World Service. There’s three.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·11 days agoAnd you think all three of those are meaningfully independent from the anglo-american military/espionage cartel?
minus-squareIchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 days agoYou’re the one making the claim. Please provide credible sources that prove that they’re compromised.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·edit-210 days agoIt could be argued that you are the one making the claim. Why is the default assumption that the sources are trustworthy until proven otherwise? Even if I accepted the burden of proof, what evidence of this would you accept? Do you think you can read about it in your favored Western sources?
minus-squarefallaciousBasis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·10 days agoThe best today are a short list of YouTube channels. Truly independent investigative journalists are a rare treasure these days.
minus-squaresubversive_dev@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·10 days agoThis, I agree with
I only get my news from trusted CIA cutouts owned by billionaire oligarchs
It’s possible to dislike propaganda irrespective of who is dishing it out.
What news source, pray tell, is not propaganda?
There are many that don’t exist exclusively to push the narrative their owners want to get out there, don’t be so obtuse.
That claim is ridiculous. Name a single media source that does not slavishly serve the political context it arises from
AP, Reuters, BBC World Service.
There’s three.
And you think all three of those are meaningfully independent from the anglo-american military/espionage cartel?
You’re the one making the claim. Please provide credible sources that prove that they’re compromised.
It could be argued that you are the one making the claim. Why is the default assumption that the sources are trustworthy until proven otherwise?
Even if I accepted the burden of proof, what evidence of this would you accept?
Do you think you can read about it in your favored Western sources?
The best today are a short list of YouTube channels. Truly independent investigative journalists are a rare treasure these days.
This, I agree with