the claim that fptp must force a two-party frame ignores the persistent reality of canada, india, the united kingdom, belgium before 1899, botswana, and papua new guinea. these nations maintain multi-party systems despite winner-take-all rules, proving that social cleavages and regional identity can easily override the supposed mechanical pressure of the ballot box.
i know what duverger’s law actually says. duverger’s law is a hollow tautology because it defines “success” by the very outcome it predicts; it survives only by dismissing every counter-example as an “incomplete transition” or a “hidden coalition.” if a law is unfalsifiable and relies on shifting definitions of significance to remain true, it explains everything while revealing nothing.
the claim that fptp must force a two-party frame ignores the persistent reality of canada, india, the united kingdom, belgium before 1899, botswana, and papua new guinea. these nations maintain multi-party systems despite winner-take-all rules, proving that social cleavages and regional identity can easily override the supposed mechanical pressure of the ballot box.
i know what duverger’s law actually says. duverger’s law is a hollow tautology because it defines “success” by the very outcome it predicts; it survives only by dismissing every counter-example as an “incomplete transition” or a “hidden coalition.” if a law is unfalsifiable and relies on shifting definitions of significance to remain true, it explains everything while revealing nothing.
So it’s only by overcoming Duverger’s law that they manage to do so.
It’s like saying rockets disprove gravity.
no, it proves that ducergers law is not actually predictive
Removed by mod