with new reddit, the writing was on the wall. a wave of bans is what helped start lemmy long before the api debaucle. when that happened, there was finally enough content that this became a usable replacement.
we are definitely ready for more content
oh, this person won’t doxx themselves! better make racist accusations!
that doesn’t tell us anything
spoken like someone who has never been banned from any community
I quoted two of the rules you’re breaking. it’s only a matter of time till the mods deal with you
if you don’t like a community’s rules, you can go make your own
you can leave
how do you know their race or gender?
and we shouldn’t vote for the people who would load it
no, it proves that ducergers law is not actually predictive
have a nice day
if you’re not willing to continued civilly in good faith, we’re done here.
I asked for policies.
please submit a list that confirms to your original comment, without the commentary.
people really could have voted for any of them. we can even write in candidates. the fact that so many did not is not evidence that those people couldn’t have.
I can name like 5 things off the top of my head that Trump did that Kamala or any other Democrat would not have done
id love to have your list, just to show the democrats who supported that policy.
as i said, it depends. most people had 3 to 6 options for president.
i’m suspicious of your last three claims. the first and third one uncritically cite poore-nemecek 2018, which indicates they either don’t understand the issues with that methodology, or they don’t care (since it makes their “research” sound more impactful). the oxford study i have read in full, and it only addresses retail costs of food, making no mention of people who receive subsidized food, free food from poverty programs, or people who raise their own food, or hunt or trap or fish for it. basically, it excludes anyone who is actually poor.
depending on the jurisdiction, and the race, and a concept called “ballot access”, yes.
they do.