Duverger’s law holds that in political systems with single-member districts and the first-past-the-post voting system, as in, for example, the United States and United Kingdom, only two powerful political parties tend to control power.
Point to a single member district, FPTP system with more than two parties that hold any significant number of seats.
more than two parties that hold any significant number of seats.
duverger’s law doesn’t say anything about a significant number of seats. you’re setting up a no true scotsman, but i know of a half a dozen places that fit your demands. if you don’t, it’s likely because you havent even looked.
Since 2013, the National Assembly and Senate have been dominated by 2 coalitions of parties, in a manner similar to dominant parties in a two party system.
Point to a single member district, FPTP system with more than two parties that hold any significant number of seats.
duverger’s law doesn’t say anything about a significant number of seats. you’re setting up a no true scotsman, but i know of a half a dozen places that fit your demands. if you don’t, it’s likely because you havent even looked.
That’s what “tend to control power” means. 1-2% of representatives being third party does not negate the overall trend.
If you can’t provide an example, why are you bothering?
oh? so duverger defined it?
I can but you’re showing your ignorance by asserting they don’t exist
If that was the case, you would have done so by now. You’re just being pointlessly contrarian and I’ve lost patience for it.
so glad to have exhausted your argumentativeness before I mention Kenya
wow, real no-true-scotsman energy here. just as i said you would go to.