To sum it up:
As often with the first version in a new series, GIMP 3.2.0 had a few annoying issues, and the most problematic of these was the bug where some layer groups would not render in specific conditions (when particular filters were used). This was the main bug warranting this early bug-fix release.
It’s mostly a bug fix with a few simple improvements for import related stuff. Plus a few little UX/UI Updates.
Hi It’s Jeff From The Overwatch Team
I still say this when I play Jeff the Landshark in Marvel Rivals.
Oh thanks for that info. I also thought games title would be “someday”, especially as it is put in quotes.
“They”. That’s one sort of people who does RTFM the wrong way in my opinion. If I do RTFM, even for obvious simple ones, I most likely point to where to look at, ideally with a link. I do not RTFM literally, but saying there is some documentation and pointing to it usually. To me just saying RTFM (literally with this acronym) is rude, especially if someone already struggles and asks basic questions. Not everyone is “they”.
The idea of RTFM is that if you have questions, then we are all on same page with basic information found in the manual. I mean you expect others explain what is already said in the manual. Its like asking how to use your microwave oven, even if you have the manual right at your hand. Now, if the manual is unclear or difficult to understand, that is a different story. Then you can at least say you didn’t understand it. The point is, that you did something before (your homework) and looked at the obvious places like the manual (and maybe further websearch).
People don’t like others being lazy and asking the questions that doesn’t need to be asked. That’s why RTFM exist. As much as you might take the “RTFM” as an offending answer, those people think of you question as offending too. Now there are people who use this term loosely in places when it is not appropriate. Also it depends on the audience. If your grandma tries to use a browser to watch funny cat videos, and asks how to use it, then it would be inappropriate to say RTFM. But if you have a Linux user who asks about how to use grep, then I think it is an appropriate reply.
The difference to the 80s crash is, its a slow burn and it affects whole world (not just the US).
No problem, it’s always good idea to ask.
By convention two dashes -- are used for options with long name, such as --remove, while single dash - is used for single letter options such as -R. There can be some extra rules how options are used and combined, but that is not always true for every application. A common implementation is that options with single dash can be combined to have less to press, while double dash options cannot. Meaning if you have options -a -b -c then you could combine them into one bucket as -abc or -ab -c, all equivalent. But you cannot combine --remove -a -b into --abremove in example. There can be some extra rules and some applications handle options bit differently.
Funny how Epic does the exact thing the other people did and somehow they’re derided for it, though.
Valve did not lay off 1000 people. Other companies doing this get the same shit as Epic does. So what exactly do you mean with this statement?
Having lots of money earned does not make a person bad. So I just disagree with your reasoning. But it’s not like i’m dumb and wouldn’t understand where you coming from.
I think you can be a billionaire and a good person at the same time. That is not mutually exclusive, just because most are bad persons. Therefore I do not agree with your argumentation. But I accept your opinion.
I can play that game too.
How much did Tim pay you for asking people how much Gaben payed to simp him?
Having an opposing opinion is off course impossible and people. People who have a different opinion are only paid actors.
I don’t get this comment. Are you suggesting Gaben is a bad person?
I know how subcommands work. But that is not the point I am making. Having two dashes in front of it or not like pacman remove or pacman --remove does not change how the command operates. It is literally having two dashes or not and therefore is not an issue.
I don’t think it would make ANY difference if the option was named git --pull instead git pull (you don’t have to use the single uppercase). That is NOT the same semantic difference between <b> and <h3>, because it (the pull example) operates the same as before. The only difference are the two dashes. I don’t see how this creates confusion or learning difficulties.
But its just a matter of 2 dashes. It shouldn’t be a problem.
I don’t get why that is a problem. It’s just an option name with 2 dashes in front. In fact, that is the “correct” way of handling options, as in standard option processing in GNU / Linux. I personally dislike options without dash, but on the other hand it does not bother me enough to be bothered by it. pacman --remove is almost identical to pacman remove, so I don’t know why that is a “problem”.
You can use long option names instead too, as each capital letter mode has a long option name, such as -R --remove and -S --sync.
Yes. If you are a human, please try it out and tell other humans if its usable. It will be different for every human, so make sure to list reasons if it is not usable.