I doubt the regime that threw dissidents out of helicopters would have just let the British Falklanders live peacefully among the Argentines.

So what should have been the right move then when Argentina invaded the islands? Should Thatcher just have abandoned the people on the Falklands and let them fend for themselves?

It’s like Mormons don’t even know their own history.

How is defending against an invasion not legitimate?

Every Argentine believes it should be colonized by them. Not a surprise when the country is like 90% descendants of colonizers. It’s the whitest in South America, the indigenous people have been mostly displaced. And it’s also the place that gave fleeing Nazis a home.

Also this:

Argentina invaded the island killed 3 Falklanders and then got their ass whooped. And to this day Argentines think they are the victims.

The US is closer to Greenland than Denmark is.