I am a software engineer living and working in Belgrade, Serbia. My hobbies contain a lot of things including cycling, bikepacking, photography. My political view are closer to left-wing anarchism.
All the photos are made by myself (if not specified other) and are shared under CC-BY 4.0.
At the same time Germany is totally fine to veto the EU-Israel trade agreement suspending. In this question Germany looks like two arms for the “unanimity among the bloc’s 27 countries” for questions related to Israel war crimes and genocide in Gaza.
How can you prove to conspiracy theorist that he is wrong while conspiracy theory does not fulfill the falsifiability criteria by definition? Like everything that can proove that the conspiracy theorist is wrong just marked as CIA propaganda / Masonic manipulation / Government is hiding / whatever? I mean if the theory accepts only facts that proove it and rejects any facts that do not, this “theory” cannot make mistakes by definition, can it?
I read the whole article and did not find an answer for a very simple question: what are benefits for users? The whole speech is about how we CAN put agents to all the devices, etc. without answering the simple question WHY should we do it. There are a lot of words about how can google and friends use the data for advertising. But nothing about motivation of users to allow it. He is talking about economical reasons but it will work if and only if users will have economical reasons to put agents on their devices. As of today I do not see a lot of usage of autonomous agents outside of the professional work like software development or ms word automation. What are reasons for people to make these agents a part of their life? The whole speech is built on top of the assumption that happens without a word about why should it. Am I missing something?
Interesting person.