Why are they still using grub? Part of the changes was thinning out grub for “security”, but systemd-boot exists and is way more secure. Is there a use case I’m missing?

We at least know the second one is true

He doesn’t know Jack about privacy shield

Wow. That’s North Korea levels of propaganda.

Reminder that VPNs are mostly pointless for privacy if you post on Facebook and don’t make your browser hard to fingerprint and track.

You make a good point. I still don’t have an ounce of patience for alcoholics who drive, but I do agree that it creates a mental trap of “you have a perfectly good car right here if you just stop drinking for 24 hours”

I’m sure the lives lost were worth it so that alcoholics and irresponsible people can keep functioning in society. /s

I don’t think alcoholics should be allowed to drive, is that too much to ask?

Driving is a privilege, not a right, and the roads are already dangerous enough as they are.

I understand the dynamics in the US are what they are regarding cars and the lack of public transportation or bicycle infrastructure, but I don’t believe the avoidable deaths are a worthy trade off. Change needs to start somewhere, and excusing the deaths for some artificially created issue is not acceptable.

It sounds like a parrot of the way conservative people talk, by coining new adjectives to make them sound like they had a “gotcha” moment. In reality, it adds nothing to the discussion, it’s just a dog whistle.

Fuck the lock, ban them from driving. Inexcusable.

fentAnyI