corbindallas

Name and shame those responsible. Why do they get to be anonymous

NOW CONVICT THOSE RESPONSIBLE

ceo bad. pumch up

a $5 locked 4 hour demo? gfy.

oh…

ok.

dynamite fishing?

Well guys… It’s endorsed by the CEO.

so there’s that

It really eats… the llamas ass

“for all his faults”

Child fucking.

Done.

Also, he did not get a ceasefire when our genocidal ally continues to BOMB CIVILLIANS THROUGH THE WHOLE THING

We don’t know those things, we infer those things, inference in law is as bad as inference in LLMs, utterly untrustworthy.

context:

1. The Initial Promise

When Ken Martin took over as DNC Chair in early 2025, he publicly committed to a transparent, deep-dive review of what went wrong in the 2024 cycle. The goal was to interview hundreds of staffers, volunteers, and voters across all 50 states to understand why the party lost ground with key demographics—specifically Latino voters, young people, and the working class.

2. The Reversal

In December 2025, Martin announced that the DNC would not be releasing the completed report to the public or the party’s rank-and-file. This move was a direct reversal of his earlier pledge of transparency. The DNC’s official rationale for the “mothballing” of the report was summed up in a now-widely quoted statement from Martin:

“Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? If the answer is no, it’s a distraction from the core mission.”

3. The Controversy

The decision sparked significant backlash from grassroots organizers and party activists for several reasons:

• Lack of Accountability: Critics argue that without a public accounting of errors, the party is destined to repeat them in the 2026 midterms.
• The “Gaza Factor”: Reports and leaks suggested the autopsy found that the administration’s policy toward the conflict in Gaza and the high cost of living were major factors in voter alienation. Some believe the report was suppressed to avoid public “finger-pointing” on these sensitive issues.
• Elitism vs. Grassroots: Many donors and volunteers felt that withholding the data they helped provide (through interviews and feedback) suggested the party leadership viewed the base on a “need-to-know” basis.

4. Current Status

As of early 2026, the report remains under seal. While Martin maintains that the party is “putting the learnings into motion” privately, the lack of a public document has left a vacuum that is currently being filled by third-party autopsies (such as those from RootsAction) and internal leaks, keeping the debate over the 2024 loss alive despite the DNC’s attempts to move on.