You either believe in god(s) or you don’t. Orthogonally you might be sure of your beliefs or not.
Most self-described agnostics are agnostic atheists.
You either believe in god(s) or you don’t. Orthogonally you might be sure of your beliefs or not.
Most self-described agnostics are agnostic atheists.

I feel that this is a bit different, since the target may not be their base, but it might be a way to try to trigger a response from islamist terrorist groups by making it about religion, and in turn drag the rest of the western world into the war. It feels too heavy handed even for the MAGAts.


Travel back in time, replace Merkel and her merry band with robotic lookalikes, implement a sane energy policy, and, as a bonus, prevent the invasion of Ukraine too?

Progress is moving forwards to the target destination. If you take a wrong turn in the fork you might still be moving forward but not progressing.
Usually yes. Depending on the country that might land you a police list though.
Wait, there are still t9 remotes that work with modern TVs?


If the EU and Iceland figure out how to solve the remaining disagreements, like the fishing policy, then it’s very likely almost all objections Norwegian people had will also be gone.


What signs? Did they finally find Keir’s balls?


There are induction stoves that have cavities for woks.
No. I’m saying it’s orthogonal, but that most self described agnostics are atheists. You can be agnostic and Christian, which, to a point, is even endorsed by the Catholic Church, but agnostic Christians usually just self label as Christian.