That’s actually not how respect works at all, what your thinking of is adoration. Respect is lost, if you don’t start with a baseline of respect for everyone, you don’t respect anyone.

Except she did order someone to kill Snow White and it didn’t work. Hence the whole hag-and-apple routine.

Nah I was just legitimately confused by the phrasing. It having two meanings doesn’t really qualify it as weird either imo. Lots of old symbols have had multiple meanings, I’d wager all of them even.

Removed by mod

Do you like ghoti sticks? Then you’re a gay ghoti.

You’re right, I’ll correct it:

You responded to the wrong person.

I think you responded to the wrong person.

Yeah my guy can’t even spell bureaucrat or oligarchy, I don’t think political science is their forte.

The complaining about Al is more annoying than the Al shit to me

This statement is absolutely meaningless coming from someone who clearly likes “the ai shit”. People complaining about ai aren’t trying to be interesting, they’re trying to convince you to stop burning the world down and killing art in the name of lulz and child porn. If you don’t want to hear people complain about ai slop, don’t post ai slop in public forums where you know people hate ai slop 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️.

IANAL and I know not everyone can afford one to fight bs like this, but none of that sounds legally enforceable.

For sure, that makes sense. I guess I was just responding to the title, it’s a useless statement.

Non-capitalist propaganda is also effective, I don’t see what this has to do with socialism.

And they can’t tell reality from fiction, though I think that’s probably true of most human ceos too.

There’s an author attribution and website right on it, you’re free to look into it if you’re concerned.

You can’t measure the effectiveness of something with no purpose or end goal.

Yeah that’s not where I thought it was going lol 🕺🏳️‍🌈🕺🏳️‍🌈🕺

Never heard of capitalist dadaism, they seem incompatible.

Could be the former, I don’t see the latter though. “You are not immune to propaganda” is an objective fact no matter who the “you” is.

That’s cool, but it was a month ago and not exactly “massive”. “Hundreds” of protesters out of the 7th most populous city in the country isn’t exactly proof of major demographical swings. In the 2020 census according to Wikipedia, more than 60% of the city’s 1.5 million residents was Hispanic, and that’s not counting the greater metro area. There’s also no demographical breakdown of the protesters—not that there necessarily should be, but without it, it’s hard to point to this as meaningful progress on the Hispanic voter front.

The last panel doesn’t make sense without any politically differing propaganda to balance it out. All they did was list things one particular group of people already believe, how is that proof that people who don’t believe those things are also susceptible to propaganda? Obviously they are, but nothing about the comic logically leads the reader to that conclusion. I don’t believe those things so why shouldn’t I trust myself? The only differing political viewpoint is the other people talking about vaccines, which isn’t propaganda.

You know that, right?