

The EU rule is one thing, but Apple isn’t allowing third party browser engines outside of EU
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
@Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
@Natanael@infosec.pub
@Natanael@lemmy.zip
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social


The EU rule is one thing, but Apple isn’t allowing third party browser engines outside of EU


I assume they’re setting their own DNS, because they’re stuck with Safari as the engine on iOS


Source code means you can refactor it to preserve that graphics. But realistically that’s unlikely if nobody wants to put the effort in
No better source than RT?


There’s certainly degrees of bias, but even the very choice in what to cover is a bias. The real question is if they’re honestly presenting the relevant facts, and are clear about what’s their own opinion.


This was mostly a ruling about the responsibility for websites (don’t have to block VPNs to enforce regional restrictions of content, etc) and VPN providers (not responsible for users circumventing regional restrictions). Websites can still choose to try to block, of course. Users can still be liable as usual if they use it to break the law but private companies are generally not responsible for enforcing that others follow the law, they’re responsible just for their own actions.
At least you have blue shells


The British suck but not literally everything they do is an invasion. And there were other Europeans there when they first arrived, not Argentinians.
Both Spain and France and UK each have stronger claims than Argentina.


If you don’t have strong consumer rights enforcement you have to do a lot of research in advance. Even then you can be hit by companies changing model later.
In B2B, if you’re in charge you need to negotiate in terms to be able to break the contract if the other side don’t deliver what they promised. If you’re just an employee, you can’t do much about your bosses making stupid decisions. They might have thought they would save money, or gotten kickbacks, and you’re stuck with the consequences.
And yes, dishonest people should be filtered out.


OK so now YOU’RE equating humans to literally just birds and plants


But if the islands were empty before? Like there’s islands who have thousands of years of history of people living there. But then there’s also those who just doesn’t. Are they supposed to stay empty? All humans always bad, or something?


So that’s what the fox says


Unless the person/entity has a history of bad behavior, which Facebook does


For some, yes. But those are the sociopaths and those are relatively few. The rest are fed propaganda but can be convinced.


Not moving the goal posts because if the first proxy in the chain goes down then nobody can connect to your server, even if the rest of the servers are all up


Using cloudflare means you’re using them as a proxy. Cloudflare can be pressured with court orders


That proxy server is visible (that’s my whole point) and can be forced to take it down, and very few use Tor or I2P


Your computer always connects to something using an IP adress which is not hidden. That something can be a proxy or similar to hide another server, but there’s always a visible server.
Amazon Sidewalk - even if you didn’t connect it, it could still be spying