Imagine they eventually drop their own ai and remain a smartphone company.

What do you mean by private? If they’re non-self-hosted, then they’re not private by definition.

It’s not super obvious, but I do see a ‘next page’ link at the bottom, before footnote references.

Next: Dynamics.

A technical post in the Technology community, nice!

Are they using ai to fix them?

Please add cross-references when you post the same post to two communities at the same time. That way, people can find the other comments and discussion.

admitted to sabotaging their company’s AI by entering proprietary info into public AI chatbots, using unapproved AI tools, or intentionally using low-quality AI output in their work without fixing it.

Are the first two really sabotaging AI initiatives? The output is still the same.

The first sounds like a security and data use issue to me. The second sounds like users may look for better tools because the provided tools are lacking - which is not sabotage. The third is the only one clearly indicating sabotage to me. (Reasonable malicious compliance under presumably bad requirements and pressure.)

They already have a foot in the door.

From the README (emphasis mine):

⚠️ We are excited about the amount of interest Thunderbolt has been getting and want to clarify that it is still early and under active development. Currently, we are targeting enterprise customers that want to deploy it on-prem. We encourage you to self-host it and try it out, but there are a few caveats we are still working on:

Mozilla is so untrustworthy these days that they had to cite themselves in the testimonial

okay, that’s kinda funny and ironic.

And it’s their only testimonial on the website. From the screenshot I thought it’d be one of multiple.

Given it’s a new product, not too surprising though, I guess. I wonder if they had any testing/cooperation partners.

If I understand correctly, these “dark points” are a systematic consequence of waves - an observable effect from the wave [interpretation] itself.

For it to ‘travel’ faster than light, it must be a specific kind of property and phase alignment between waves.

I would love an animation showing this. Given that it is possible, I imagine three or more waves could lead to the visibly ‘traveling’ zero amplitude point, and it would be quite obvious and followable how that ‘point’ can travel faster than the waves are.

I don’t get why it feels like doing it for money in the absence of a unique situation. Should they not sue because many others suffer the same way?

Even if they sue for money, before court it becomes neutral. The negative implication from your assumption seems unwarranted.

That doesn’t read/seem very novel. Seems like a pretty obvious iteration or implementation if you wanted to implement something like that.