The armchair propaganda and meme critic in me thinks this also conflates anti-imperial violence with imperial/settler-colonial violence and perhaps could better communicate the reality in some other way. Violence is necessary in struggles against violent oppression and resistance is not equivalent to ethnic cleansing, genocide, economic siege, or liberal coups.

Is this critical of the anemic ‘no kings’ protest movement or is it the idea that no kings could or ought to include opposition to the war with Iran in its agenda?