Heiliger Strohsack

I don’t really know where to ask this.

You may consider contacting a helpline.

I wonder if Citizenfour (Edward Snowden) will share some of his thoughts regarding this with us sooner or later.

They have to navigate a lot more typical relationship deal breakers and may be in a better position to advise how to compromise in a relationship.

A lot? Some of them may be more or less famous and therefor a little different when in public, the reputation of the industry is rather bad, the actors and their relatives are subjected to shame, hate or similar. Also most of them have varying sex partners. If we put them on a list of deal breakes these are maybe one of the ones.

On the other hand someone might worry more about other obstacles in a relationship like spend too much/little time together, lack of or bad communication, trust issues, to be an equal part when it comes to care, housework, finance or too much emotional, material dependence. These are way more common I think and if you are able to compromise regarding these “inside” things you have a solid base to handle the “outside” things more easily. The advice of a porn actor is only helpful if all parties agree that all possible conditions inside a relationship could be ranked and are being ranked without contradiction.

I don’t think being a porn actor disqualifies them from giving relationship advice any more than anyone else’s job does.

Neither do I. It feels like you think I value them less as a person than others. I do not. Do we have a misunderstanding here because of my grammar or another barrier related my english skills?

They don’t live in a porn vacuum. They absolutely have relationships outside of their job.

Yes, sure. I agree. But I doubt they do have more experience and/or knowledge in this field than the average person. Teachings how a relationship can improve are limited, because its quite unpredictable due to the mix of cultural, individual and social norms.

These people are actors. I doubt they have more knowledge regarding (romantic) relationships. Also their way to orgasms are not necessarily genuine, the producers and performers are using tricks.

Passions are beautiful.

(Am I the only one who wants to know the whole statement?)

Great parenting right there.

The first one I registred back then was uncreative yet convenient: My full legal name. I like to advise almost anyone to do so.

For all the places where you do not need or want to reveal your identity you can use something harmless website3001 (or just any random number)

First, all those restaurants in the comic offer franchises to entrepreneurs. It is common for most entrepreneurs to go with franchises since they are easier to run

Fair enough. But when I think about entrepeneurship, motivation and health comes/stays with some kind of passion rather than earning money “quick and dirty”.

I like to see it when they bring some passion to the table, by really like to cook, bake and/or host guests that want to have a somehow more or less special moment. A delicious lunch or snack during a break, a date, a birthday party, you name it. While the surrounding is just pleasant for them and their staff.

Second, Toast is becoming big with independent restaurants. So, there is a way for independent restaurants to have loyalty programs and run an app.

I’ve never heard of it. I looked it up. For me its a trap that ultimately result in even more pressure and less focus on the original object(s) of the company. It may support the administrative tasks behind the scenes, granted, but technology which replaces most human interactions and relations will make the restaurant loose its appeal (if it had one in the first place).

If you are a owner with some kind of passion described above I think you gain genuine loyalty in return. You could offer your guest(s) free stuff coming on the house, give a discount and give them a geniune feeling of being welcome and treated with respect. In my opinion thats way more worthy - for all those who are involved.

Don’t forget to greet, when some Bandicoot passes by.

From my POV (which might collide with reality (yes, please unconfuse me)) the density of fast-food chains in the US is pretty high, but I mean, come on, the size of the land you use is not small.

If your body craves for some burger or the like there could be plenty of alternatives, no? What is it that attracts people to these products?

I’ve been told not just a few of you are proud of entrepreneurs within family/friends or being one themselves. At least some of them could be owner-operated restaurants or diners. No one’s forced to buy from the big players.

Bonus Panel: Alright Mr. Truman, today’s session is going to end soon. See you next week. Bye!

Yeah. The overall look of the photo is kinda retrofuturistic in my opinion. The thing could be a ticket booth for nearby bumper cars or other amusement rides like this.

So it might be stationary now, but only because it seems abadoned or it is not getting any/enough maintenance lately. I think in theory it should have moved a while ago or it may be some sort of trick to fool ordinary people so they assume the police presence at this site with this “equipment” is a response to a temporary actual or declared state of that particular area.

Does this thing move on a regular basis? It seems more like a mobile office parking nearby next to a site where crime or protest might happen or is being expected. And beside the cameras more dangerous for the police force itself. Or is it just a prop of a funfair?

By let them use this building, the state respresented by the local administration has the legal task to supervise almost anything the laws and regulations specify, like safety regulations in case of a fire, maintenance activities and so on.

Also law enforcement and intelligence are probably happier to watch and observe whatever the people actually (plan to) do in a (more) “easy mode”. Even if its getting used for distraction and/or propaganda by the russian officials it may deliver some evidence for acutal threats of which some are unlikely to find in the whole wide world with almost unlimited possibilities.

This seems to be purely symbolic to me. Russian officials and their allies (could) do bad things not just this in this particular building. I mean they have embassies around the continent and dummies/third parties could buy, rent or operative any kind of facility.

So we express or preference(s), but I assume the executives of the ECB or another institution will have the final say.

I agree, but some buildings may be copyright-protected, no?