• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Unfortunately, Sailfish OS uses a proprietary (closed source) android compatibility layer, as well as a closed source UI.

        For the parts they have open-sourced, they implementrd a CLA that contributers must sign. It’s the HA-CLA-I-ANY license, which specifically allows them a perpetual Copyright and Patent license, and permission to relicense your code contributions to a more restrictive license which enables them sell or package it into a closed-source proprietary app.

        Personally I’d be more comfortable supporting the development of PostmarketOS instead, since it is completely open-source with no CLA, meaning no chance of any rug-pulling in the future.

        • Zoot@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Having a CLA like that just screams “Were going to monetize all of this one day” lol

        • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Disclaimer: yes, SFOS is made by a (small) for-profit company. Always has been.

          For the parts they have open-sourced, they implementrd a CLA that contributers must sign.

          Just to clarify, this applies only to previously closed core components. Not app developers. But thanks for the info.

          I love the constant comparison to PMOS, which has exactly 0 daily-driveable devices. SFOS has been usable since 2013, and honestly I don’t see a rug-pull coming up. Call me naive.
          It’s a European company btw.

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            47 minutes ago

            If you’re comfortable with it being a private company that has proprietary software and utilizes a CLA for its own components, then by all means, use them.

            Personally I’m at a point where I distrust any essential software that isn’t GPL licensed, as that’s the only way to ensure that it’ll always be in the community’s hands. Otherwise, we’re just hedging that Sailfish won’t someday be sold to a larger publicly traded company, who will then utilize the potential lock-in factor that the proprietary parts of Sailfish and the CLA’d components bring.

            PMOS is certainly not in a usable state for the average person yet, which is why I suggest people donate to it so it can become more polished and support more phones.

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        they dont ship to the us. also the mobile-focused software is still early on linux, but as long as it is daily drivable I can handle that.