The largest review of medicinal cannabis to date found it doesn’t effectively treat anxiety, depression, or PTSD—despite millions using it for those reasons. Researchers warn it could even make mental health worse, raising risks like psychosis and addiction while delaying proven treatments. Some limited benefits were seen for conditions like insomnia and autism, but the evidence is weak. The findings are fueling calls for stricter oversight as cannabis use continues to rise.
Study: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpsy/article/PIIS2215-0366(26)00015-5/fulltext
Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260319044656.htm
Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.



This is how meta analyses work:
you look at available research, aggregate over it, draw conclusions. It is not unusual that such meta studies even point out that more research is needed.
In fact, it is often helpful to get this ‘more research’ funded.
The issue is this is bit a HUGE meta study. The results are being presented disingenuously.
Yeah, doesn’t get as many clicks as “medium-small” meta study does it.
Then it needs to say more research needed instead of making the misleading claim there’s no effect
No significant effect does not mean no effect, very crucial difference. It means that the effect wasn’t statistically significant, i.e. <5% chance of being random.