• modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not so much hide the ship as make it extremely difficult to spit direction of travel and range-find. Skills very much required to place feet on stair-treads.

      • ThisSeriesIsFalse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dazzle Camo isn’t to hide the ship, per say. It’s to make it much harder to tell which way the ship is facing, and therefore what its heading is.

        • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not only that, the broken lines can also make it somewhat difficult to get an accurate range using an (optical) coincidence rangefinder (where you have to align two half images to determine the range to an object) as commonly used on many warships for aiming the guns back then.

          view of a warship through a coincidence rangefinder

            • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              The rangefinders on surface warships were different indeed (Germany used stereoscopic instruments, while the Allies preferred the coincidence type), but the other purpose of confusing a submarine, which can’t have such fancy rangefinding equipment due to the limitations of having to look through a periscope, which can’t incorporate coincidence nor stereoscopic rangefinders due to its small size, did work somewhat better. However, at the short distances involved in WW1 submarine warfare, it is debatable whether the inaccuracies induced by the dazzle camouflage were large enough to ensure a miss with anything but exceptionally fast ships.