a million pieces/segments sneering at hasan piker and the co-chair of the DSA, meanwhile a republican congressional candidate in upstate new york named peter oberacker is the grandson of an actual nazi germany soldier and his former staffer was part of the ‘i love hitler’ young GOP group chat
While I agree there’s no moral high ground, and Britain was always a terrible empire daddy, and the scramble for Africa was wrong… there was very clearly a difference in approach.
But but… Western country… fascists! They’ve always been fascists!! I’m morally superior to EVERYONE!! - .ml user in a nutshell
Please do explain the differences in approach between the Nazis and the British and American governments when it comes to colonization and the persecution of undesirables.
The only real differences are of degree, and since that was pretty much a result of staring down the business end of the losing side of a war, it’s easy for me to imagine us acting similarly. For instance, had Japan invaded the contiguous US and were approaching our internment camps and Indian reservations, the decision to convert them to kill camps seems like something we would have done.
You’ve delved way too far into whataboutism. I can’t argue what should or could have happened in the WW2 era. No one is alive from that time to have an educated discussion about it. It’s a question for a historian, which I am not.