• Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    You are looking at what is presented to you and no further. You aren’t actually interested in anything besides asking pointed questions you think will be a “gotcha”. Different races do not have to be present for it to be implied. Anytime you paint vegans as tiny and immasciated you are perpetuating meat industry propaganda and racism for them.

      • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        I think you need to read a history book. You’re all pissed off but I’m not even wrong. The carnist diet and ‘you need meat’ ideology is all rooted in racism. You can’t even point out my alleged ‘problems’. You just state that there is some and leave it at that to feel superior. Do you need reading material suggestions to learn about American culinary and agricultural racism?

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You’re bad at mind reading. I’m entertained, amused. Quite happy realy. You saved me from boredom.

          I’m not sure that your problems are yet. You aren’t engaging with my pertaining questions or points, so I can’t really evaluate what they may be.

              • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                So if the carni was weak and unkempt while the vegan had massive titties, it wouldn’t be propaganda?

                Lies. Deception. You opened with sea lioning.

                • Steve@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  It’s a question. Not even a statement, let alone a lie.
                  It’s a question designed to look for assumed bias, by flipping the roles of the example to see if the judgement of the situation still holds.

                  If the judgement fails to hold, it’s likely a biased judgement.

                  Your unwillingness to engage in the question is a tassit admission of your bias, and your awareness of it. Your disregard for the importance of that bias suggests a sense of superiority. That your opinion supercedes any rules. Can you think of anyone else who shares that kind of confidence?